On 12/21/07 at 16:29, Derrick Brashear wrote:
> Unintentional. I'll get new binaries online. Sorry.
Never mind. Thanks for your quick response.
--
Markus Alt
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
IBM Deutschland Entwickl
e provide an updated tarball?
On a side note: It seems that the new stuff has been built with umask
077, thus permissions need to be adjusted after installation for
world-readable/executable files (klog, tokens, etc.). It would be
helpful if it could be built with umask 022 again (as before). Tha
colin ellis wrote:
>
> I am still having problems with segmentation faults
> when writing to cells.
>
> Has anyone used afs alongside reiserfs? I have
> reiserfs on root partition and I'm wondering if the
> kernel modifications for reiserfs conflict with the
> afs module.
I use ReiserFS on all
Is there any reason why rxdebug isn't build automatically when compiling
OpenAFS from the tarball sources? (At least it doesn't when I compiled
it following the instructions in the README.)
With IBM AFS, I found it very handy for getting the version of the
client and/or server process(es) a remot
ther, of course.)
All of the commands I've tested so far work (some of the bos, vos and fs
suites' subcommands), but without a functioning cache manager, this is
rather useless ...
Any words of wisdom?
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Alt
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
stem
first, but after switching to ReiserFS again, it also works flawlessly.
--
Markus Alt
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-info
y
filesystems. Do you see any difficulties in that?
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Alt
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-info
