Sounds to me then that reading volume local on server would be an
improvement, since RX would be out of the picture.
-- Nathan
> -Original Message-
> From: Nickolai Zeldovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECT
We're using it without any problems. I have a equivalent patch that does
most of what Ken's does against krb5-current if you want it.
As for NT, works just fine, although aklog is usually a pain to get
built/etc.
-- Nathan
> -Original Message-
> > This doesn't really refer to a project
> I had hoped this referred to the native k5 support outlined
> at the last
> Decorum. Does anyone (besides us) still believe that would
> be a valuable
> enhancement? Has anyone been able to find the notes from the
> presentation?
Same here... and in fact, on the Win2K clients, I'd like
> [1] For the AFS cache's partition, I tried with an Ext2 filesystem
> first, but after switching to ReiserFS again, it also works
> flawlessly.
FYI - we've been running quite a number of machines pure-reiserfs with afs
without any trouble at all. One definite benefit - being able to build a 500
If you're going to do it, I recommend that you use Maildir format spools.
That eliminates the need for locking entirely. It also lets you deliver into
the same spool simultaneously from multiple servers at the same time.
Layout would be:
[afs servers 1-x ] <-> [mail servers 1-x]
Your m
