On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:47:38PM -0800, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >BTW, a PAG facility that's faithful to the AFS notion of PAGs
> >should be
> >relatively easy to specify and implement for Solaris, but it will be
BTW, Solaris tasks approach the semantics of PAGs. See settaskid(2).
They're not quite what you want for two reasons: a) they're already in
use for something else, so you don't know that someone isn't going to
change a process' taskid without doing the AFS thing to keep credentials
associated wit
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 02:21:08AM -0500, Marcus Watts wrote:
> Going the other way from what Nico proposes, why not have a very
> general per-module way for modules to add resources per-process?
>
> There's really only a few points where the "generic" environment
> needs to interact with the modu
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:03:58PM -0600, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> >On Friday, February 23, 2007 09:23:21 AM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>So getting 100,000 in equipment is only part of it. If you are
> >>willing to state a desire to tage
