I believe you will need to restart all your client machines.
Jaap Winius wrote:
Hi folks,
My AFS network used to have six hosts: thee db servers and three fs
servers. Thinking that I might be able to end some unexplained behavior,
I decided to consolidate them and have three hosts.
I did
Is this an x86 Solaris 10 box running on Nehalem?
Aaron Knister wrote:
Good afternoon!
I'm writing to report a deadlock issue I'm seeing on Solaris 10.
What I've observed is that when a file larger than the configured size
of the cache is copied out of AFS the cache manager deadlocks and
:
The box in question is an x86 VM running in VMware ESXi on a host with
dual Opteron CPUs. I have also reproduced it on a pre-nehalem and a
nehalem Intel system. All are running the latest patches to Solaris 10 u8.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Patricia O'Reilly orei...@qualcomm.com
Hi folks,
I have several old retired fileservers (systems are not online) that still show
up in clients server preferences, sometimes as a different machine name if the
old IP address was recycled. I've used bos removehost for db servers but what
is the command to remove fileservers from the
awesome. thanks!
Derrick Brashear wrote:
vos changeaddr -remove
Derrick
On Jun 9, 2011, at 15:22, Patricia O'Reilly orei...@qualcomm.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have several old retired fileservers (systems are not online) that still
show up in clients server preferences, sometimes
Is there any problem connecting 1.6 clients with 1.4.14 servers?
Russ Allbery wrote:
Simon Wilkinson s...@inf.ed.ac.uk writes:
We need to be careful that we don't burn out the volunteers who provide
this service by creating releases too frequently. This is going to be
especially important
Yes, please complain to Oracle about this. We have the same problem with Sol 10
Update 9 here and Oracle has not been very responsive. Umounting with the patch
in the run level script or using SMF didn't solve the problem.
--patty
Jeff Blaine wrote:
Sorry:
Both are AFS clients and not AFS
you know if they
have an update.
Andrew Deason wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:41:26 -0800
Patricia O'Reilly orei...@qualcomm.com wrote:
Yes, please complain to Oracle about this. We have the same problem
with Sol 10 Update 9 here and Oracle has not been very responsive.
Umounting
I may butcher this a bit as I am not a kernel person. Reboot on Solaris will
not work, period -- with or without the patch. This is not good for our
environment as customers expect reboot to work the way it always has.
You can use the init scripts and all will be well unless you have an
28, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Patricia O'Reilly orei...@qualcomm.com
wrote:
I may butcher this a bit as I am not a kernel person. Reboot on Solaris will
not work, period -- with or without the patch. This is not good for our
environment as customers expect reboot to work the way it always has
From what you have described it sounds to me like you need the patch that
Andrew referenced earlier that allows you to configure an -offline-timeout and
-offline-shutdown-timeout option on your fileservers. We have has similar
problems at our site and will be releasing that patch into
Was there any type of maintenance being done on the system? ZFS takes a
snapshot of the filesystem prior to maintenance, then reverts back to that
snapshot after the maintenance is complete. That means if your server was
running when the initial snapshot was taken, the SALVAGE.fs file was in
We manage 18,000 Unix/Linux machines via configuration files and packages
stored in AFS. So far nothing else comes close to scaling as well as AFS. The
configuration management system was developed in house. We edit in one place
and the information is pulled (from AFS) by the client based on
When it comes to compiling on an afs filesystems, there isn't always an
alternative as the binaries for large packages often times contain paths
pointing to where they were built. One could try to get around this with
the magic of symlinks during the build process but is often complicated
with
14 matches
Mail list logo
