>
> > OpenAFS + ZFS with encryption enabled?
>
> I assume you mean ZFS on the fileserver side. This thread is about
> client-side encryption (i.e. so the server doesn't know what's in the
> users' files).
Yes, was thinking about server side.
> If you _are_ talking about the client-side (putting
OpenAFS + ZFS with encryption enabled?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>
> The Windows cache manager even takes things a step further by
> maintaining a negative cache for EACCESS errors on {FID, user}. This
> has avoided hitting the abort threshold limits triggered by Windows
> that
> assumes that if it can list a directory it must be able to read the
> status of a
Hi,
Recently I came across an issue where 'make install' which was installing
software to AFS was taking *much* more time on a Solaris client than on
Linux client. The issue turned out to be a lack of optimization on VFS layer
in Solaris, and VOP_MKDIR in AFS isn't optimized for it either (on Linu
Hi,
Just to let you know - Andrew recently pushed "SOLARIS: Support VSW_STATS".
What it actually does it enables in Solaris collection of standard VFS stats
and it also makes fsinfo::: DTrace probes fire for AFS file system.
For example:
$ fsstat /ms 1
new name name attr attr lookup rddir
Hi,
Just to let you know - Andrew recently pushed "SOLARIS: Support VSW_STATS".
What it actually does it enables in Solaris collection of standard VFS stats
and it also makes fsinfo::: DTrace probes fire for AFS file system.
For example:
$ fsstat /ms 1
new name name attr attr lookup rddir
> -Original Message-
> From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
> ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Heinrichs
> Sent: 04 October 2013 17:08
> To: openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] ZFS-on-Linux on production fileservers?
>
> Am Freitag 04 Oktober 2013,
> -Original Message-
> From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
> ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Blaine
> Sent: 04 October 2013 15:32
> To: OpenAFS
> Subject: [OpenAFS] ZFS-on-Linux on production fileservers?
>
> [ For those running ext3/ext4, a question further d
> -Original Message-
> From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
> ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Deason
> Sent: 03 October 2013 19:17
> To: openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: [ Openafs : cache on zfs ]
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:34:27 +0200
> nicol
> -Original Message-
> From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-
> ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Deason
> Sent: 03 October 2013 19:17
> To: openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: [ Openafs : cache on zfs ]
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:34:27 +0200
> nicol
We have a very positive experience with OpenAFS + ZFS. We run it on x86
hardware (different vendors) and on top of Solaris 11 x86. We've managed to
save lots of money due to ZFS built-in compression while improving on
performance, reliability, manageability, etc.
See my slides at
http://confere
11 matches
Mail list logo
