Ingo van Lil wrote:
Yes, there is: I'm using ReiserFS for all my regular partitions. Forgot
to mention that, sorry.
No you didn't; you did mention it :)
--
Chris Crowther
J&M Crowther Ltd.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https
On 10 Mar 2005, Jim Rees wrote:
> Also, there is no reason the cache has to be on a separate partition.
Yes, there is: I'm using ReiserFS for all my regular partitions. Forgot
to mention that, sorry.
Apart from that: Having the cache on a separate partiton avoids AFS
problems in case the / partit
Sometimes people's root partition is reiserfs or xfs (or...) ...
Matt
Jim Rees wrote:
That was easy, thanks a lot. :-)
Also, there is no reason the cache has to be on a separate partition.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://li
That was easy, thanks a lot. :-)
Also, there is no reason the cache has to be on a separate partition.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
On 10 Mar 2005, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> Upgrade to OpenAFS 1.3.79... The 1.3.78 version has a problem that causes the
> cache fs to remain marked in use even when AFS has been shut down.
That was easy, thanks a lot. :-)
Cheers,
Ingo
__
Upgrade to OpenAFS 1.3.79... The 1.3.78 version has a problem that causes the
cache fs to remain marked in use even when AFS has been shut down.
Kris
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:36:44PM +0100, Ingo van Lil wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I recently installed OpenAFS 1.3.78 on my Linux 2.6.8 laptop.
>
Hi there,
I recently installed OpenAFS 1.3.78 on my Linux 2.6.8 laptop.
Unfortunately I didn't think I'd ever need to access AFS on that machine
when I installed my distribution, so I didn't allocate any space for an
ext2 AFS cache partition (I'm using reiserfs for about everything). So,
in order
