Hi!
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Tim Spriggs wrote:
Isn't there something about needing a small percentage of space to be able
to keep the ext3/ext2 filesystem from fragmenting too much? Does this
apply here?
Not that I know of. Even so, 25 GB on a 500 GB filesystem is a bit
excessive, wouldn't
Tim Spriggs wrote:
Isn't there something about needing a small percentage of space to be able
to keep the ext3/ext2 filesystem from fragmenting too much? Does this
apply here?
Also, is there a problem with running on ext3? I only ask because I know
openafs can not use journaling filesystems
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:20:32PM +0200, Stephan Wonczak wrote:
[snip]
We can't do much about the number of inodes, but we are still
sitting with the 5% reserved blocks. Over all partitions this adds to a
lot of wasted space (~500GB).
Now, obviously we would rather use this space :-)
Hi!
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Frank Burkhardt wrote:
snip
Now the question: Are there any repercussions when changing the number
of reserved blocks in this way, or are there any subtle side effects on
the fileserver?
AFAIK there should be no problem using 'tune2fs -r' or 'tune2fs -m' on
a
Isn't there something about needing a small percentage of space to be able
to keep the ext3/ext2 filesystem from fragmenting too much? Does this
apply here?
Also, is there a problem with running on ext3? I only ask because I know
openafs can not use journaling filesystems under Solaris.
Thanks,
