Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-04-04 Thread Paul Johnson
Can I please have the address for the SRPM or spec file that works with the 1.4.1 rc10 on FC5? I can't find it by browsing in the openafs website. On 3/30/06, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Simon Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- Paul E. Johnson Professor, Political Science 1541

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-04-04 Thread Derek Atkins
http://www.openafs.org/dl/candidate/ ... -derek Quoting Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can I please have the address for the SRPM or spec file that works with the 1.4.1 rc10 on FC5? I can't find it by browsing in the openafs website. On 3/30/06, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-04-04 Thread Paul Johnson
Thank you very much. I successfully rebuilt the RPM on an SMP system and it installed and runs fine so far! pj On 4/4/06, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.openafs.org/dl/candidate/ ... -derek Quoting Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can I please have the address for the

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-04-04 Thread Derek Atkins
Um, did my RPMS not work on the SMP system? -derek Quoting Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you very much. I successfully rebuilt the RPM on an SMP system and it installed and runs fine so far! pj On 4/4/06, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.openafs.org/dl/candidate/

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread Steve Devine
Peter M. Metcalf wrote: Derek, Well, so far I have contacted the list about 3 times and I've yet to come up with that warm and fuzzy feeling you get when a mentor takes you into his confidence and helps you over a problem. Where I understand how busy you must be there at MIT, we here at ND

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread sxw
Its worth noting that 1.4.1rc10 won't work on FC5 either. There are a couple of further problems. *) FC5 shipped with a 2.6.16rc kernel pretending to be 2.6.15. This meant that some of the tests in OpenAFS don't pick up on the correct mechanisms to use with that kernel. In particular this

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 07:33:51PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: 1) There hasn't been an OpenAFS release that actually supports FC5 kernels, only a release candidate (1.4.1rc10) This is also the case with the just-released FC4 update. And finally: I've been sick and therefore everything I've

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread Jason McCormick
Derek Atkins wrote: 2) The default FC5 kernel doesn't work with PAGs (although this is fixed in an update kernel that should be out soon) Just out of curiosity, what does this mean? I've been rebuilding the FC4 kernels to remove the Read-Only patch so PAGs will work. Is this something

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Jason McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Derek Atkins wrote: 2) The default FC5 kernel doesn't work with PAGs (although this is fixed in an update kernel that should be out soon) Just out of curiosity, what does this mean? I've been rebuilding the FC4 kernels to remove the Read-Only

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread Simon Wilkinson
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Derek Atkins wrote: Derek Atkins wrote: 2) The default FC5 kernel doesn't work with PAGs (although this is fixed in an update kernel that should be out soon) The exact kernel problems with FC5's distributed kernel have been discused here (and on -devel) for a while.

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-30 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Simon Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Derek Atkins wrote: Derek Atkins wrote: 2) The default FC5 kernel doesn't work with PAGs (although this is fixed in an update kernel that should be out soon) The exact kernel problems with FC5's distributed kernel have

[OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-29 Thread Peter M. Metcalf
Derek, Well, so far I have contacted the list about 3 times and I've yet to come up with that warm and fuzzy feeling you get when a mentor takes you into his confidence and helps you over a problem. Where I understand how busy you must be there at MIT, we here at ND do little side jobs like

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-29 Thread Derek Atkins
Peter, Peter M. Metcalf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Derek, Well, so far I have contacted the list about 3 times and I've yet to come up with that warm and fuzzy feeling you get when a mentor takes you into his confidence and helps you over a problem. I'm sorry you feel that way. I've been

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 9) There still isn't any official OpenAFS release that supports FC5. I'm working with the OpenAFS people to determine whether I should build RPMs of 1.4.1rc10 or rather wait a few more days for an official release (I don't know their schedule).

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-29 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 9) There still isn't any official OpenAFS release that supports FC5. I'm working with the OpenAFS people to determine whether I should build RPMs of 1.4.1rc10 or rather wait a few more days for an official

Re: [OpenAFS] Fedora 5

2006-03-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My problem is that I need to perform the builds myself.. You have the luxury of a build farm that will do it all for you. ;) It literally takes me days to build everything. Yeah, that is nice. :) Any estimate on how far off 1.4.1 is? If it's going