: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again. Numbers
On Friday 30 November 2007 02:52:06 pm Jerry Normandin wrote:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is
using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes
On Dec 3, 2007, at 9:53 AM, John Lockard wrote:
I'm curious about those using ext3... Are you running
ext3 with or without journaling?
With.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
Am Montag, 3. Dezember 2007 schrieb ext John Lockard:
I'm curious about those using ext3... Are you running
ext3 with or without journaling?
w/o journaling it's called ext2 :-)
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49
@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I
] On Behalf Of John Lockard
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 9:54 AM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
I'm curious about those using ext3... Are you running
ext3 with or without journaling?
-John
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 06:59:29PM -0800, Jerry
AM
To: Jerry Normandin
Cc: John Lockard; openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
the spec file is fixed in CVS and will be in thenext version also.
On Dec 3, 2007 10:02 AM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
with. I was asked to upgrade to 1.4.5
On Dec 3, 2007 1:52 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried to build the openafs userspace code on Redhat ver 3?
the rpm build scripts fail.
This is sort of news, in the sense that the RPMs on the web site were
built by me on RHEL3.
Get the RHEL3 srpm from the web
] *On Behalf Of *Derrick Brashear
*Sent:* Monday, December 03, 2007 1:54 PM
*To:* openafs-info@openafs.org
*Subject:* Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Dec 3, 2007 1:52 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried to build the openafs userspace code on Redhat
Redirected to the list.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:34 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm my beginning of my email should of read
OK I am running:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SOURCES]# more /etc/issue
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 8)
Kernel \r on an \m
I'm not
built openafs 1.4.5 on
redhat enterprise 3 with?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Brashear
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:32 PM
To: OpenAFS-Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
Keep it on the list.
Anyway, this is really
On Dec 3, 2007 2:50 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah.. sorry about that I intended to post to the group. I thought I hit
reply-all.
Here's where I got the SRPM:
http://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.4.5/rhel3/SRPMS/openafs-1.4.5-rhel3.1.src.rpm
openafs-buildall.sh
It appears that there's a problem with the openafs.spec file
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Brashear
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:55 PM
To: OpenAFS-Info
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:50 PM, Jerry
systems on Linux, again.
On Dec 3, 2007 2:50 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ah.. sorry about that I intended to post to the group. I thought I hit
reply-all.
Here's where I got the SRPM:
http://www.openafs.org/dl/openafs/1.4.5/rhel3/SRPMS/openafs-1.4.5-rhel3.
1.src.rpm
On Friday 30 November 2007 02:52:06 pm Jerry Normandin wrote:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes a hell of a long time to
create,
Delete,
Jerry Normandin wrote:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes a hell of a long time to
create,
Delete, or rename files. I tested with
Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes a hell of a long time to
create,
Mike Garrison wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is
using
Ext3 for the /vicepa
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mike Garrison
Sent: Fri 11/30/2007 4:41 PM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3
] File systems on Linux, again.
Mike Garrison wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is
using
no i dont think rx locking is the problem. the rx locking is
actually pretty good. i had tracked this down with fstrace
at one point but i seem to have lost the trace at the moment.
i will dig around and see if i can find it.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Matt Benjamin writes:
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey, Chas,
Sorry to bug.
I've been looking at this, tangentially, because I've been working with
bypassing dcache/memcache, writing direct into page cache. Pretty far
along on that side of things. Is rx locking so coarse that in general
only one
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ia.net,Jerry Normandin writes:
write performance is actually impressive. file creation and deletion
are very slow on afs.
because writing is easier than reading. the afs cache manager can
group the outgoing writes together and send them in a single message.
while
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes a hell of a long time to
create, Delete, or rename files.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
woot, chas :)
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
no i dont think rx locking is the problem. the rx locking is
actually pretty good. i had tracked this down with fstrace
at one point but i seem to have lost the trace at the moment.
i will dig
, November 29, 2007 2:36 PM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
Smith, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After the recent thread openafs upgrade from 1.4.1 to 1.5.7, and a
review of a thread[1] from July, I'm wondering if there is a
definitive
recommendation
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Allbery
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 2:36 PM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] File systems on Linux, again.
Smith, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After the recent thread openafs upgrade from 1.4.1
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AFS on EXT3? No there are Metadata issues. EXT3 was intended for
this.
I inherited a mess here that I am fixing. My predecessor built is
using
Ext3 for the /vicepa filesystems. It takes a hell
After the recent thread openafs upgrade from 1.4.1 to 1.5.7, and a
review of a thread[1] from July, I'm wondering if there is a definitive
recommendation for which file system to use on Linux AFS file servers.
Ext3, XFS, JFS, something else?
Thanks all,
-Matt
[1]
Smith, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After the recent thread openafs upgrade from 1.4.1 to 1.5.7, and a
review of a thread[1] from July, I'm wondering if there is a definitive
recommendation for which file system to use on Linux AFS file servers.
Ext3, XFS, JFS, something else?
It shouldn't
Smith, Matt wrote:
After the recent thread openafs upgrade from 1.4.1 to 1.5.7, and a
review of a thread[1] from July, I'm wondering if there is a definitive
recommendation for which file system to use on Linux AFS file servers.
Ext3, XFS, JFS, something else?
Thanks all,
-Matt
[1]
31 matches
Mail list logo