Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Derek Atkins wrote:
Dan Pritts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
openafs.org won't necessarily issue RPMs for each and every RHEL point
kernel release but rebuilding and making your own is not too hard;
you'd
just have to build your own openafs-kernel
For years we have maintained classroom 'gateway' boxes that ran an afs
client and exported user space via samba.
These machines were always Suns of some flavor running Solaris.
Now we have been mandated to migrate to x86 and we have been
experimenting with different Linux OS's.
We would very much
How is Debian, Ubuntu , Slackware , Mandriva in this regard?
i am using debian sarge with openafs 1.4.2 (build from source) and
kernel 2.6.18.2. works well... update (to kernel or openafs client) +
rebuild is quite simple.
also, i have created a simple custom script to load the correct
MS infringement claims.
Tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Devine
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:51 AM
To: OpenAFS-Info
Subject: [OpenAFS] Linux afs client suggestions.
For years we have maintained classroom 'gateway' boxes
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted creedon wrote:
It's a small price to pay for something that works. And Novell is protected
from future MS infringement claims.
If you're going to use the above as a claim for why to buy a novell
product then it might be best to mention that novell
You are correct, They're up to something.
-Original Message-
From: seth vidal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'OpenAFS-Info'
Subject: RE: [OpenAFS] Linux afs client suggestions.
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted
seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted creedon wrote:
It's a small price to pay for something that works. And Novell is protected
from future MS infringement claims.
If you're going to use the above as a claim for why to buy a novell
product then it might be best
'
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Linux afs client suggestions.
seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 08:25 -0800, ted creedon wrote:
It's a small price to pay for something that works. And Novell is
protected
from future MS infringement claims.
If you're going to use the above as a claim
On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:50, Steve Devine wrote:
For years we have maintained classroom 'gateway' boxes that ran an afs
client and exported user space via samba.
These machines were always Suns of some flavor running Solaris.
Now we have been mandated to migrate to x86 and we have been
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Steve Devine wrote:
I know that we can get Fedora rpms from openafs but I question how
closely they follow the kernel releases.
How is Debian, Ubuntu , Slackware , Mandriva in this regard? Would we
get better results with Red Hat Enterprise?
You'll
Dan Pritts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
openafs.org won't necessarily issue RPMs for each and every RHEL point
kernel release but rebuilding and making your own is not too hard; you'd
just have to build your own openafs-kernel rpms that contained the module
for the newest point release, put the
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Derek Atkins wrote:
Dan Pritts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
openafs.org won't necessarily issue RPMs for each and every RHEL point
kernel release but rebuilding and making your own is not too hard; you'd
just have to build your own openafs-kernel rpms that contained the
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
If someone can provide a script to easily notice update kernels available
for (RPM, at least) platforms we support I will work on getting something
automated to kick out more builds.
how about this:
curl -l
13 matches
Mail list logo
