Re: [OpenAFS] MIT krb5 utilities don't acquire afs tokens

2005-10-08 Thread ph rhole oper
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:10:48 -0400, "Derek Atkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Please make sure you CC the list on all replies.. I'm not the only > one who can help you! sure, im sorry :) > > "ph rhole oper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why use pam if the 2.0 kit does the job? > > The 2.0

Re: [OpenAFS] MIT krb5 utilities don't acquire afs tokens

2005-10-07 Thread Derek Atkins
Please make sure you CC the list on all replies.. I'm not the only one who can help you! "ph rhole oper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why use pam if the 2.0 kit does the job? The 2.0 kit requires you to run "aklog" by hand. I thought you wanted to automate the process. > So, it seems like im

Re: [OpenAFS] MIT krb5 utilities don't acquire afs tokens

2005-10-07 Thread Derek Atkins
"ph rhole oper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > aklog works fine with kerberos v5 on our network, but standard > kerberized utilities (telnetd,rshd,ftpd,etc..) > won't acquire afs tokens after they get any tickets forwarded.Is there a > patch for these utilities so that > once you login you'll have

[OpenAFS] MIT krb5 utilities don't acquire afs tokens

2005-10-06 Thread ph rhole oper
aklog works fine with kerberos v5 on our network, but standard kerberized utilities (telnetd,rshd,ftpd,etc..) won't acquire afs tokens after they get any tickets forwarded.Is there a patch for these utilities so that once you login you'll have afs tokens too? The following methods have already been