On 02/25/2015 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Hi all,
Linux 2.4 is getting long in the tooth, and it is becoming clear that
attempting to continue to support it is a drain on the scarce OpenAFS
development resources which could be better used to modernize the
codebase and implement security and
On 26 Feb 2015, at 14:08, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil
wrote:
In message alpine.gso.1.10.1502251140560.3...@multics.mit.edu,Benjamin
Kaduk writes:
In particular, the threading library used by Linux 2.4, LinuxThreads, is
Not completely accurate -- there are some 2.6
In message alpine.gso.1.10.1502251140560.3...@multics.mit.edu,Benjamin Kaduk
writes:
In particular, the threading library used by Linux 2.4, LinuxThreads, is
Not completely accurate -- there are some 2.6 kernel based distributions
with LinxuxThreads (although they hopefully provide NPTL as
Hi all,
Linux 2.4 is getting long in the tooth, and it is becoming clear that
attempting to continue to support it is a drain on the scarce OpenAFS
development resources which could be better used to modernize the
codebase and implement security and performance improvements such as rxgk
and
On 02/25/2015 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Hi all,
Linux 2.4 is getting long in the tooth, and it is becoming clear that
attempting to continue to support it is a drain on the scarce OpenAFS
development resources which could be better used to modernize the
codebase and implement security and
Dear Ben,
even the oldest machines in our lab are running Linux 3.x, so dropping
Linux 2.4 support would not affect our business.
Best,
Volkmar
Zitat von Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu:
Hi all,
Linux 2.4 is getting long in the tooth, and it is becoming clear that
attempting to continue to
