Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Kim Kimball wrote:
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Kim Kimball wrote:
Have you tried setting MTU on the fileserver command line instead?
No, and I don't want to. Our problem is with just a few clients
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Kim Kimball wrote:
Have you tried setting MTU on the fileserver command line instead?
No, and I don't want to. Our problem is with just a few clients using
VPNs
I don't want to slow everyone else down.
Didn't for us, couldn't be measured to any significance.
Kim Kimball wrote:
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Kim Kimball wrote:
Have you tried setting MTU on the fileserver command line instead?
No, and I don't want to. Our problem is with just a few clients using
VPNs
I don't want to slow everyone else down.
Didn't for us, couldn't be measured to
FWIW, this appears to be the same problem I reported in
April, but for Windows.
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2009-April/031127.html
We are still working with our networking+VPN folks to
try to determine if it's the same thing or not, as well
as how to fix it.
Jeff Blaine wrote:
FWIW, this appears to be the same problem I reported in
April, but for Windows.
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2009-April/031127.html
We are still working with our networking+VPN folks to
try to determine if it's the same thing or not, as well
as how to
Jeff Blaine wrote:
FWIW, this appears to be the same problem I reported in
April, but for Windows.
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2009-April/031127.html
We are still working with our networking+VPN folks to
try to determine if it's the same thing or not, as well
as how
In order to enable OpenAFS to operate across releases of the Cisco
IPSec VPN client prior than 5.0
We're not running sub 5.0 Cisco VPN software, but I'll give it
a shot.
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Jeff Blaine wrote:
FWIW, this appears to be the same problem I reported in
April, but for Windows.
Jeff Blaine wrote:
FWIW, this appears to be the same problem I reported in
April, but for Windows.
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2009-April/031127.html
We are still working with our networking+VPN folks to
try to determine if it's the same thing or not, as well
as how to fix
Kim Kimball wrote:
Have you tried setting MTU on the fileserver command line instead?
No, and I don't want to. Our problem is with just a few clients using VPNs
I don't want to slow everyone else down.
That's what we've done, for the same reason. It has worked, and we
don't have to
For anyone interested, I sent in a patch today for this
[grand.central.org #124880] AutoReply: Add -rxmaxmtu parameter to afsd to help
avoid VPN fragmentation of UDP packets
Kim Kimball wrote:
Have you tried setting MTU on the fileserver command line instead?
That's what we've done, for the
Have you tried setting MTU on the fileserver command line instead?
That's what we've done, for the same reason. It has worked, and we
don't have to fiddle with each client. The negotiation between AFS
client and fileserver for MTU size is fileserver wins.
Kim Kimball
Douglas E. Engert
We are having problems with Mac OS 10.4 and 10.5 using Cisco VPN
AFS can become unusable. Mac 10.4 is running OpenAFS 1.4.8 for sure.
I think the Mac 10.5 is running OpenAFS 1.5.59.
Using rxdebug and looking at the natMTU parameter, on most Unix systems
this is 1444,(1500 - 56) as expected. On
12 matches
Mail list logo
