Linux client performance - was Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-04-17 Thread Volkmar Glauche
Dear all, for the sake of completeness, I would like to revive this thread and share some of my findings. As I wrote below, I intended to make better use of large disks for AFS cache partitions, but my initial attempts actually made the AFS clients unusable for our requirements. One

Re: Linux client performance - was Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-04-17 Thread Rich Sudlow
On 04/17/2015 10:02 AM, Volkmar Glauche wrote: Dear all, for the sake of completeness, I would like to revive this thread and share some of my findings. As I wrote below, I intended to make better use of large disks for AFS cache partitions, but my initial attempts actually made the AFS clients

RE: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-01-21 Thread Robert Milkowski
Milkowski -Original Message- From: openafs-info-ad...@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info- ad...@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Volkmar Glauche Sent: 08 January 2015 14:20 To: openafs-info Subject: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes Dear all, we are running OpenAFS clients

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-01-08 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Volkmar Glauche volkmar.glau...@uniklinik-freiburg.de writes: Dear all, we are running OpenAFS clients with up to 1TB space available for cache partitions. These are multiuser cluster nodes where cache space should be as large as possible. Until now, there was (inadvertently) a limit

[OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-01-08 Thread Volkmar Glauche
Dear all, we are running OpenAFS clients with up to 1TB space available for cache partitions. These are multiuser cluster nodes where cache space should be as large as possible. Until now, there was (inadvertently) a limit of ~200GB set to the cache size by restrictive afsd options. I now