On Wednesday, March 23, 2005 08:26:54 AM -0500 "Todd M. Lewis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Q. Where is this enforced? Specifically, what's different about implicit
'a' rights if somebody is running a 1.2 server with a 1.3 client? How
about a 1.3 server and a 1.2 client? Mixed servers? Other re
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Bob Cook wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2005, Todd Lewis wrote:
Not quite. The owner of a directory has implied administrator
rights in that directory.
[...] although Todd is right about the behavior, Derrick
Brashear acknowledged at last year's Best Pra
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Bob Cook wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2005, Todd Lewis wrote:
Not quite. The owner of a directory has implied administrator
rights in that directory.
On Tuesday March 22, 2005, Kim Kimball wrote:
You're right of course about the directory ownership.
Although it's getting a bit f
On Monday, March 21, 2005, Todd Lewis wrote:
>> Not quite. The owner of a directory has implied administrator
>> rights in that directory.
On Tuesday March 22, 2005, Kim Kimball wrote:
>You're right of course about the directory ownership.
Although it's getting a bit far afield from the origina
rle'
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Question about append-only directories
> and ownership of files
>
>
>
>
> Dexter 'Kim' Kimball wrote:
> >
> > In general AFS doesn't care about ownership/mode bits --
> ignores them
> > entirely on directo
On Friday, March 18, 2005 08:57:41 PM -0500 "Thomas M. Payerle"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this behavior "expected"? Am I missing something? Is there a way in
AFS to have a file be append-only (possibly with creation if missing, but
without being "readable") that does not depend on the pri
Dexter 'Kim' Kimball wrote:
In general AFS doesn't care about ownership/mode bits -- ignores them
entirely on directories,
Not quite. The owner of a directory has implied administrator rights in that
directory. That may be relevant here. Or not. Whatever.
--
+--
:58 PM
> To: openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: [OpenAFS] Question about append-only directories and
> ownership of files
>
>
> I have a cgi script on a web server writing into an AFS
> directory with
> ACL rights wilk; i.e. "write" permission set minus the &q
I have a cgi script on a web server writing into an AFS directory with
ACL rights wilk; i.e. "write" permission set minus the "r". The desired
intent was to create a directory containing a file which the cgi script can
append to, but would be unable to read from.
The above appeared to be working
