On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:18:15 -0400 (EDT)
an...@njit.edu wrote:
> Thanks for providing this latest patch. This fixed the issue we were
> running into. I hope that this issue can be addressed in the 1.6.3
> release.
So you know, the direction / the "current plan" of the 1.6 release-team
is that
! Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:18:03 -0500
! From: Andrew Deason
! To: openafs-info@openafs.org
! Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: Change in volume status during vos dump in OpenAFS
! 1.6.x
!
! On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
! Andy Malato wrote:
!
! > We applied the above patch, but
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:43:48 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Malato wrote:
> We applied the above patch, but are still seeing the same issue when
> performing a 'vos dump' on a volume, a 'vos listvol' shows the volume
> as not being able to be attached as opposed to the old expected
> behavior of being busy.
Y
! Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
! From: Andy Malato
! To: Andrew Deason
! Cc: "openafs-info@openafs.org"
! Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Change in volume status during vos dump in OpenAFS
! 1.6.x
!
!
!
! ! Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:22:25 -0500
! ! From: Andrew Deas
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:41:48 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Malato wrote:
> So while a volume can grow to more than 2 terabytes in size, the
> various tools may not work correctly with volumes this large ?
If you are running 1.6.2 fileservers, or fileservers patched for the 2TB
issue, everything works. The is
On 3/14/2013 7:11 AM, Andy Malato wrote:
>
> ! Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:57:02 -0400
> ! From: Jeffrey Altman
> ! To: matthew.hosk...@njit.edu
> ! Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
> ! Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Change in volume status during vos dump in
> OpenAFS
> !
! Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:57:02 -0400
! From: Jeffrey Altman
! To: matthew.hosk...@njit.edu
! Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
! Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Change in volume status during vos dump in OpenAFS
! 1.6.x
!
! Matt:
!
! Have you looked at the man pages?
!
! http://docs.openafs.org
Matt:
Have you looked at the man pages?
http://docs.openafs.org/Reference/index
The pages for "fs listquota", "fs quota", "fs setquota", "fs setvol",
"vos clone", "vos copy", "vos create", "vos examine", "vos move", "vos
partinfo", and "vos shadow" include the following text:
"Currently, the
Do you have any suggestions on where we could display this information?
> You're not the first person to ask this.
>
>
A table somewhere under wiki.openafs.org would work...
A matrix of Volume and File limits across client and server versions.
But really this matrix and changes to it should be in
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Malato wrote:
> Are the max partition and volume size for each server and client
> version documented anywhere ? We have attempted to search for this
> information but have not found it.
There are no such limits; a partition or volume can be any s
On 3/13/2013 3:50 PM, Andy Malato wrote:
> ! There is no such specific limitation. There are some bugs in 1.4 for
> ! "large" volumes in general, but not around the 2TB mark specifically.
> ! And there is a problem with space reporting for volumes and partitions
> ! larger than 2TB, but they still
! Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:12:40 -0500
! From: Andrew Deason
! To: openafs-info@openafs.org
! Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: Change in volume status during vos dump in OpenAFS
! 1.6.x
!
! On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
! Andy Malato wrote:
!
! > We were of the understanding that th
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Malato wrote:
> We were of the understanding that there was a 2TB limit on partitions
> with 1.4.x which is not the case in 1.6.x.
There is no such specific limitation. There are some bugs in 1.4 for
"large" volumes in general, but not around the 2
! Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:22:25 -0500
! From: Andrew Deason
! To: openafs-info@openafs.org
! Subject: [OpenAFS] Re: Change in volume status during vos dump in OpenAFS
! 1.6.x
!
! On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:01:32 -0400 (EDT)
! Andy Malato wrote:
!
! > We recently installed OpenAFS 1.6.2
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:01:32 -0400 (EDT)
Andy Malato wrote:
> We recently installed OpenAFS 1.6.2 on one of our fileservers in
> preparation for migrating the rest of our cell to the latest 1.6.x
> release. One of the driving factors behind upgrading to 1.6.x is to
> support volumes larger than
15 matches
Mail list logo
