I'll echo this. While I think jeff paints an overly dire picture, if you are so
hard up that you need to throw away data (no, it's not a lark. You want to
discard data. It's fine, but I feel no compunction to be helpful) can I suggest
a cron job, a dot file, pretty much anything other than handi
On 10/21/2010 6:30 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
> Derrick Brashear writes:
>> POSIX extended attributes are stored in the files. Until we deal with
>> them natively (which requires new RPCs) deleting them actively loses
>> data.
>
> Look, this fuss about "losing data" is a real distraction; can we hand
omall...@msu.edu writes:
> I can understand where large sites don't want to go this route
> globally since it could break something. ...
> I can understand where AFS Team doesn't want to make it a global
> default option.
> I can understand where a user would want the ability to just not
> creat
Derrick Brashear writes:
> Since you suggest your first comments are what we misinterpret:
I do not suggest that.
- a
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Derrick Brashear writes:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Adam Megacz wrote:
>>
>> Brandon S Allbery KF8NH writes:
>>> No, he wants AFS to simply refuse to create resource forks,
>>
>> Almost. I would like the AFS CLIENT to refuse, if the user has
>> explicitly requested this behavior.
>
>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Adam Megacz wrote:
>
> Brandon S Allbery KF8NH writes:
>> No, he wants AFS to simply refuse to create resource forks,
>
> Almost. I would like the AFS CLIENT to refuse, if the user has
> explicitly requested this behavior.
The AFS client does what the Darwin ke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/13/10 00:18 , Adam Megacz wrote:
> Brandon S Allbery KF8NH writes:
>> (And apparently his use case is to be considered the common one.)
>
> I'm having trouble parsing this.
Notwithstanding the latest message, what you said came across as deman
Adam Megacz writes:
> There's a MacOS setting to disable the first kind of litter.
^^^
> Is there any chance of a setting being included in the MacOS client that
^^^ ^^
It appears that everybody who replied to t
Brandon S Allbery KF8NH writes:
> No, he wants AFS to simply refuse to create resource forks,
Almost. I would like the AFS CLIENT to refuse, if the user has
explicitly requested this behavior.
> because in his world they never have any use whatsoever.
In my world they have no use whatsoever f
Steve Simmons writes:
>> Is there any chance of a setting being included in the MacOS client that
^^
> Doing this at our site would result in a firestorm of complaints from
You and I seem to be talking
10 matches
Mail list logo
