If you're only using volumes for home directories, or things like group
collaboration space, then RO volumes are not very useful to you.
Actually, that's definitely not true in my experience. See below.
As you mentioned, they can also 'kinda' be used for backup purposes,
[ snip ]
I
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:06:34 +0200
Jaap Winius jwin...@umrk.nl wrote:
In an organization where it is only necessary for an administrator to
either give users read-write access to volumes, or no access at all,
what would be the advantage of creating any read-only replicas, beyond
those
On 17 Jun 2010, at 16:29, Andrew Deason wrote:
If you're only using volumes for home directories, or things like group
collaboration space, then RO volumes are not very useful to you.
Actually, that's definitely not true in my experience. See below.
As you mentioned, they can also 'kinda' be
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:35:13 +0100
Simon Wilkinson s...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
As you mentioned, they can also 'kinda' be used for backup purposes,
[ snip ]
I definitely wouldn't recommend that for home dirs or anything like
that, though, since from the user's perspective it looks like their
