On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:59:19 +0200 (EET)
jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
> Thanks for the help, I got it working now
>
> -chunksize 23 transfer speeds:
>
> 20M/2000 files:
>
> SSH to AFS ~150KB/s
> AFS to SSH ~285KB/s
To be clear, none of the suggestions given were intended to improve this
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:02:10 +0200 (EET)
> jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
>
>> > 109M single file:
>> >
>> > SSH to AFS ~525KB/s
>> > AFS to SSH ~800KB/s
> [...]
>> I tried turning off encryption, but it didn't make a notable
>> difference with either file transfer test
>
> Okay, well that
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:30:32 +0200 (EET)
jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
> I'm propably not doing this correctly, but hopefully we're on to
> something:
>
> 1st trial
> # afsd -chunksize 20
> > afsd: Error calling AFSOP_CACHEINODE: not configured
>
> 2nd trial
> # invoke-rc.d openafs-client
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:02:10 +0200 (EET)
> jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
>
>> > 109M single file:
>> >
>> > SSH to AFS ~525KB/s
>> > AFS to SSH ~800KB/s
> [...]
>> I tried turning off encryption, but it didn't make a notable
>> difference with either file transfer test
>
> Okay, well that
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:02:10 +0200 (EET)
jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
> > 109M single file:
> >
> > SSH to AFS ~525KB/s
> > AFS to SSH ~800KB/s
[...]
> I tried turning off encryption, but it didn't make a notable
> difference with either file transfer test
Okay, well that's obviously bette
I tried turning off encryption, but it didn't make a notable difference
with either file transfer test
br, jukka
>
>
>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:43:50 +0200 (EET)
>> jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
>>
>>> I just moved ~20M/~2000 files
>>
>> Do you mean each file is 20M? Or you moved 2000 files
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:43:50 +0200 (EET)
> jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
>
>> I just moved ~20M/~2000 files
>
> Do you mean each file is 20M? Or you moved 2000 files, and added
> together they form 20M of data in total?
20M in total
>
>> AFS to SSH server ~220KB/s
>> SSH server to A
On 3/22/2012 3:43 PM, jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> here are some ping results outside LAN:
>
> 1.62 1.80 1.62 2.33 1.69 1.64 1.75 2.35 5.77 3.85 4.69 2.73 ...
>
> The internet speed is the same 100/5.
>
> I just moved ~20M/~2000 files
> AFS to SSH server ~22
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:43:50 +0200 (EET)
jukka.tuomi...@finndesign.fi wrote:
> I just moved ~20M/~2000 files
Do you mean each file is 20M? Or you moved 2000 files, and added
together they form 20M of data in total?
> AFS to SSH server ~220KB/s
> SSH server to AFS ~80KB/s
>
> The client was
Hi all,
here are some ping results outside LAN:
1.62 1.80 1.62 2.33 1.69 1.64 1.75 2.35 5.77 3.85 4.69 2.73 ...
The internet speed is the same 100/5.
I just moved ~20M/~2000 files
AFS to SSH server ~220KB/s
SSH server to AFS ~80KB/s
The client was in WAN this time, whereas both
The lacks large window sizes is unlikely the issue in this case. The use case
is reading large numbers of small files which require a separate RPC for each
object. An 8MB window size won't help when the file sizes are small and the
number of files is large. The RPC latency * number of RPCs is
On 22 Mar 2012, at 15:23, Andrew Deason wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:20:20 +
> Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> That limit is imposed because it is the point at which the current RX
>> implementation loses the queue efficiency/throughput tradeoff. You can
>> run with a larger window size, but
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:20:20 +
Simon Wilkinson wrote:
> That limit is imposed because it is the point at which the current RX
> implementation loses the queue efficiency/throughput tradeoff. You can
> run with a larger window size, but it will actually make things go
> slower.
>
> It was nai
On 22 Mar 2012, at 15:09, Andrew Deason wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:18:44 -0400
> chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
>
>> but besides this limit, there is also another determining factor in
>> rx. rx, like tcp, negotiates a window of data to send before waiting
>> for an ack from the other
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:18:44 -0400
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> but besides this limit, there is also another determining factor in
> rx. rx, like tcp, negotiates a window of data to send before waiting
> for an ack from the other side which lets me data get sent. if the
> window doesnt
15 matches
Mail list logo
