Am Donnerstag 17 Juni 2010, 01:06:34 schrieb Jaap Winius:
> This subject is confusing to me, because I've learned that once a
> client has encountered a read-write mount point, it becomes biased
> towards accessing only read-write replicas beyond it, ignoring any and
> all perfectly usable r
Quoting Lars Schimmer :
Simple - Load Balancing. Imagine a cell at three countries hold together
by small ISDN lines - a RO copy local to each faculty and the have fast
access.
Yes, but "In an organization where it is only necessary for an
administrator to
either give users read-write access
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jaap Winius wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a hypothetical question regarding the replication of AFS volumes:
>
> In an organization where it is only necessary for an administrator to
> either give users read-write access to volumes, or no access at al
Hi folks,
Here's a hypothetical question regarding the replication of AFS volumes:
In an organization where it is only necessary for an administrator to
either give users read-write access to volumes, or no access at all,
what would be the advantage of creating any read-only replicas, beyond
