On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Heinz-Ado Arnolds
wrote:
> Derrick Brashear wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Heinz-Ado Arnolds
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a little problem with the new allowed partition sizes in 1.4.8.
>>> We are working with 10TB partition sizes and up to 2T
Derrick Brashear wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Heinz-Ado Arnolds
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a little problem with the new allowed partition sizes in 1.4.8.
>> We are working with 10TB partition sizes and up to 2TB volumes inside these.
>> A "fs lq" to one of these partitions repo
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Heinz-Ado Arnolds
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little problem with the new allowed partition sizes in 1.4.8.
> We are working with 10TB partition sizes and up to 2TB volumes inside these.
> A "fs lq" to one of these partitions reports a overbooking result for the
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Is the fs command you are using from 1.4.8?
% which fs
/usr/afsws/bin/fs
% strings -a /usr/afsws/bin/fs | grep OpenAFS
@(#) OpenAFS 1.4.8 built 2008-11-28
>
> Heinz-Ado Arnolds wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a little problem with the new allowed partition sizes in 1.4.8.
Is the fs command you are using from 1.4.8?
Heinz-Ado Arnolds wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little problem with the new allowed partition sizes in 1.4.8.
> We are working with 10TB partition sizes and up to 2TB volumes inside these.
> A "fs lq" to one of these partitions reports a overbooking res
Hi all,
I have a little problem with the new allowed partition sizes in 1.4.8.
We are working with 10TB partition sizes and up to 2TB volumes inside these.
A "fs lq" to one of these partitions reports a overbooking result for the
partition:
% fs lq
Volume Name Quota Used %
