Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
I have to admit I'm a little curious why you switched from inode to
namei on a Solaris server...
A little bit off-topic:
Admittedly I frowned myself for years at voices promoting the use of
the namei fileserver in favour of the inode one, until...
on the
Rainer Toebbicke wrote:
A little bit off-topic:
Admittedly I frowned myself for years at voices promoting the use of
the namei fileserver in favour of the inode one, until...
on the inode fileserver the inc(), dec() operations always translate
into real I/Os. You cannot do a lot such
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
Under the circumstances you describe, yes, this is normal.
However, you switched to namei, which doesn't have that feature (and can't,
since it doesn't use a modified fsck). So on your first start, the
bosserver forced a salvage, but there weren't
Hi, we recently had a fileserver crash because of an ecache error.
When the server came back up it had the further misfortune of a fibre
channel adapter error which prevented the drives containing the vice
partitions from coming back online. Once those issues were dealt
with, the system was again
On Thursday, April 13, 2006 09:41:49 AM -0700 Renata Maria Dart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, we recently had a fileserver crash because of an ecache error.
When the server came back up it had the further misfortune of a fibre
channel adapter error which prevented the drives containing the
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:49:50PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
I have to admit I'm a little curious why you switched from inode to namei
on a Solaris server...
Interestingly, I have been considering moving to solaris as my afs server
platform (from linux) and have been wondering what the
On Thursday, April 13, 2006 07:10:24 PM -0400 Dan Pritts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:49:50PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
I have to admit I'm a little curious why you switched from inode to
namei on a Solaris server...
Interestingly, I have been considering
