Quoting Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thursday, July 13, 2006 09:29:58 AM -0400 Derek Atkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
unfortunately LINUX_VERSION_CODE is fragile too. just using the new
build test and building a complete module will let you check for this new
"sys_open is gp
@openafs.org; Jeffrey Hutzelman
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] SuSE 10.1 kernel 2.6.16.13-4/64Bit compile error -
OpenAFS 1.5.2
On Thursday, July 13, 2006 09:29:58 AM -0400 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> unfortunately LINUX_VERSION_CODE is fragile too. just using the new
>&
On Thursday, July 13, 2006 09:29:58 AM -0400 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
unfortunately LINUX_VERSION_CODE is fragile too. just using the new
build test and building a complete module will let you check for this new
"sys_open is gpl'ed" condition. this would make the page_follow
]
On Behalf Of Derek Atkins
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:30 AM
To: chas williams - CONTRACTOR
Cc: Jeffrey Hutzelman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] SuSE 10.1 kernel 2.6.16.13-4/64Bit compile error -
OpenAFS 1.5.2
"chas williams - CONTRACTOR" <[EM
"chas williams - CONTRACTOR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelma
> n writes:
>>> MODPOST
>>> FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module libafs.ko uses GPL-only symbol
>>> 'sys_open'
>>
>>Bastards.
>>Well, I guess we could LINUX_VERSION_CODE it out or someth
Enclosed are 4 cases, the configure is shown as well as aclocal and
patch when used.
The only case that works at all is case#4 which requires a patch,
aclocal and then ./configure and make -s.
There are plenty of compile errors in case#4 but it does link and install...
Is it stable enough to try
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelma
n writes:
>> MODPOST
>> FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module libafs.ko uses GPL-only symbol
>> 'sys_open'
>
>Bastards.
>Well, I guess we could LINUX_VERSION_CODE it out or something. I hate to
>break things if there's some older kernel where th
On Wednesday, July 12, 2006 04:39:08 PM -0400 chas williams - CONTRACTOR
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey
Hutzelma n writes:
while on this subject, it looks like it will be necessary to build a
complete module to test for certain features. the latest bleedi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelma
n writes:
>> while on this subject, it looks like it will be necessary to build a
>> complete module to test for certain features. the latest bleeding edge
>> kernel has apparently made sys_open an exported gpl symbol. so while the
>> symbol is pres
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, ted creedon wrote:
1. Some of the problem is my fault. It was being build with an i386
directive in the ./configure.
ok
2. The stock build installs OK except aklog doesn't compile and install
it won't if you don't tell it to
--with-krb5
3. Running the patch in opena
On Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:40:23 PM -0400 chas williams - CONTRACTOR
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey
Hutzelma n writes:
It's true that for bleeding-edge kernels, sometimes there's something
new that we need to test for. However, OpenAFS does build on
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelma
> n writes:
>
>> It's true that for bleeding-edge kernels, sometimes there's something new
>> that we need to test for. However, OpenAFS does build on 2.6.16 kernels,
>>
>
> while on this subject, it look
10.1 kernel 2.6.16.13-4/64Bit compile error -
OpenAFS 1.5.2
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey
Hutzelma
n writes:
>It's true that for bleeding-edge kernels, sometimes there's something new
>that we need to test for. However, OpenAFS does build on 2.6.16 kernels,
while on
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Jeffrey Hutzelma
n writes:
>It's true that for bleeding-edge kernels, sometimes there's something new
>that we need to test for. However, OpenAFS does build on 2.6.16 kernels,
while on this subject, it looks like it will be necessary to build a
complete module to
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Atkins
> > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:34 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
> > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] SuSE 10.1 kernel 2.6.16.13-4/64Bit compile error -
> > OpenAFS 1.5.2
> >
TECTED]
Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] SuSE 10.1 kernel 2.6.16.13-4/64Bit compile error -
OpenAFS 1.5.2
"ted creedon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm not at all sure what this error is when building OpenAFS 1.5.2.
Any clues?
Tedc
[snip]
/data/
It actually compiles and the client runs.
There was an incorrect i386 sysname in my shell script. The patch is not
needed?
aklog is missing, whats the best thing to do?
Thanks
Tedc
+ case amd64_linux26 in
+ cc -O -I/data/openafs-1.5.2/src/config -I. -I.
-I/data/openafs-1.5.2/include -I/data
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Derek Atkins writes:
>This has been discussed on the -devel list a number of times.
>The kernel tests don't work for certain bleeding-edge kernels.
there is a patch one could test in openafs ticket #34561.
___
OpenAFS-info
Is there any particular branch for 64 bit?
Tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Derek Atkins
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] SuSE 10.1 kernel 2.6.16.13-4/64Bit
"ted creedon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not at all sure what this error is when building OpenAFS 1.5.2.
>
> Any clues?
>
> Tedc
[snip]
> /data/openafs-1.5.2/src/afs/LINUX/osi_machdep.h:55:2: error: #error Not sure
> what to do about rlim (should be in the Linux task struct
[snip]
This has
I'm not at all sure what
this error is when building OpenAFS 1.5.2.
Any clues?
Tedc
make[5]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/linux-2.6.16.13-4'
CC [M]
/data/openafs-1.5.2/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.16.13-4-default-ted-MP/afs_atomlist.o
CC [M]
/data/openafs-1.5.2/src/libafs/MODL
21 matches
Mail list logo
