[OpenAFS] about failover - 2 servers (one "master" one replicas) - a bit long

2010-03-22 Thread Vladimir Konrad
Hello, I have 2 servers (lets called them A and B). The A holds all of the read/write volumes, all of these volumes are replicated to B (read only). The OpenAFS services run on both, in pretty much identical set-up. Both servers also have the OpenAFS clients. [A]<--

Re: [OpenAFS] about failover - 2 servers (one "master" one replicas) - a bit long

2010-03-22 Thread Harald Barth
> The strange thing is, that when server B went down, pretty much everything > went to halt, > e.g. periodic downloads running on A would not be able to write to AFS > anymore a the > linux desktops would loose access to AFS. No, there is no failover from reading the RW when the RO goes away. Y

Re: [OpenAFS] about failover - 2 servers (one "master" one replicas) - a bit long

2010-03-22 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag 22 März 2010 10:43:51 schrieb Vladimir Konrad: > Would you please give me few pointers on what to try to have AFS clients > work even if the B goes down? Create r/o replicas on A (and on the same vice partition), too. The problem with your setup is that OpenAFS clients use the r/o path

Re: [OpenAFS] about failover - 2 servers (one "master" one replicas) - a bit long

2010-03-22 Thread Vladimir Konrad
Hello Dirk, > Create r/o replicas on A (and on the same vice partition), too. Will do. > The problem with your setup is that OpenAFS clients use the r/o path to > access > data in replicated volumes, but you have put all your r/o replicas on one > single machine, so you have created a single

Re: [OpenAFS] about failover - 2 servers (one "master" one replicas) - a bit long

2010-03-22 Thread Harald Barth
> OpenAFS is not designed for automatic failover. serverA volume.readonly -> serverB volume.readonly works automaticly serverA volume.readonly -> serverB volume (readwrite) does _not_ fail over automaticly Harald. ___ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS