I swear I hit something like this a few years ago (2008),
but cannot for the life of me find any info on the problem
or solution.
Solaris Studio 12.2
Solaris 10 SPARC
OpenAFS 1.4.14
MIT Kerberos 1.6.3 in /usr/rcf-krb5
make dest
...
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -I/usr/rcf-krb5/include -DALLOW_REGISTER
I was speaking of OpenAFS, not OpenBSD/Heimdal in general. It would be nice
to have krb5-config on OpenBSD, but it's not necessary for OpenAFS.
As a distributor of software other than OpenAFS, yes you have a problem.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAF
>krb5-config is not needed on OpenBSD because Heimdal is installed in a
>standard place. All that's needed is to avoid running the MIT krb5-config.
Urrrk. Explain to me, as a software distributor, how exactly I'm
supposed to determine _which_ Kerberos libraries to link against on
OpenBSD? I am
krb5-config is not needed on OpenBSD because Heimdal is installed in a
standard place. All that's needed is to avoid running the MIT krb5-config.
Do you really need aklog when you have Heimdal's afslog?
Not really, but I do like to run the same software on all platforms when I
can.
___
* Jim Rees [2005-12-21 17:20:37 -0500]:
> I don't know. It's whatever came with OpenBSD 3.6, so it would be at least
> a year old.
Heimdal has had krb5-config since at least version 0.5, but OpenBSD's
customised makefile doesn't seem to build it. I checked OpenBSD 3.8,
which has Heimdal 0.6.3 (pl
I don't know. It's whatever came with OpenBSD 3.6, so it would be at least
a year old.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Quoting Jim Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
When /i/ first
started playing with it I assumed that when I used --enable-krb5 it would
perform an AM_PATH_PROG(KRB5_CONFIG, krb5-config) and search in my path..
That wouldn't work for me. I've got a /usr/local/bin/krb5-config for MIT,
but I normally u
Quoting Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was thinking of making that the default, but when the whole thing
about making it work with autoconf 2.13 came out, I lost interest in
writing complex autoconf macros (does 2.13 even have AC_PATH_PROG()? I
don't know, and I'm not interested in diggin
Jim Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That wouldn't work for me. I've got a /usr/local/bin/krb5-config for MIT,
> but I normally use Heimdal and it has no krb5-config.
That's odd -- what version of Heimdal? The one in Debian has a
krb5-config. Maybe that's a Debian local modification? I didn
> When /i/ first
> started playing with it I assumed that when I used --enable-krb5 it would
> perform an AM_PATH_PROG(KRB5_CONFIG, krb5-config) and search in my path..
>
>That wouldn't work for me. I've got a /usr/local/bin/krb5-config for MIT,
>but I normally use Heimdal and it has no krb5-co
Configure generates src/aklog/Makefile even if you don't specify
--with-krb5. That's ok because the top-level Makefile doesn't try to
descend into src/aklog. But you run into trouble if someone tries to do the
make manually, because the correct flags won't be set.
This is really user error but w
./configure --with-krb5-config=/usr/lib/mit/bin/krb5-config
--with-afs=/usr/local --with-krb5-src=/data1/krb5-1.4.1
and a manual -lcrypto works for Ken' s kit on a SuSE system
tedc
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
doh.. I assumed configure would look for krb ou
When /i/ first
started playing with it I assumed that when I used --enable-krb5 it would
perform an AM_PATH_PROG(KRB5_CONFIG, krb5-config) and search in my path..
That wouldn't work for me. I've got a /usr/local/bin/krb5-config for MIT,
but I normally use Heimdal and it has no krb5-config.
On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:41 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
doh.. I assumed configure would look for krb out of box.. calling --
with-krb5-conf fixed things right up.
So, you didn't give it any Kerberos options _at all_ to configure?
I ask
because in that case, make is not supposed to try to build
Quoting Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
doh.. I assumed configure would look for krb out of box.. calling --
with-krb5-conf fixed things right up.
So, you didn't give it any Kerberos options _at all_ to configure? I ask
because in that case, make is not supposed to try to build aklog, and
>doh.. I assumed configure would look for krb out of box.. calling --
>with-krb5-conf fixed things right up.
So, you didn't give it any Kerberos options _at all_ to configure? I ask
because in that case, make is not supposed to try to build aklog, and if
it did, then that's a bug in the Makefil
On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
I noted this conversation in the archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openafs-info@openafs.org/msg18512.html
aklog_main.c:198:2: error: #error "Must have either keyblock or
session member of krb5_creds"
aklog_main.c:204:2: error: #error "You m
>I noted this conversation in the archives:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/openafs-info@openafs.org/msg18512.html
>
>...which leads me to believe that the I have to build my own aklog,
>regardless of which rpm's I use.
One final note: I realized that you were the guy who had the "Can't get
infor
I just went through this same thing on OpenBSD. In my case it was a matter
of adding -lcrypto to KRB5LIBS. As Ken said, check config.log to find out
what the problem is, then adjust KRB5CFLAGS and KRB5LIBS.
You didn't say how you configured, but if you have a working krb5-config the
easiest thin
>I noted this conversation in the archives:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/openafs-info@openafs.org/msg18512.html
>aklog_main.c:198:2: error: #error "Must have either keyblock or
>session member of krb5_creds"
>aklog_main.c:204:2: error: #error "You must have one of
>krb5_524_convert_creds or k
I noted this conversation in the archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openafs-info@openafs.org/msg18512.html
...which leads me to believe that the I have to build my own aklog,
regardless of which rpm's I use.
When I try to build aklog, however, I generate this error:
gcc -pipe -O2 -DALLO
21 matches
Mail list logo
