On Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:27:57 PM -0800 Adam Megacz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really think it's more of a political issue than anything else; I
doubt they'd ever accept anything involving public key crypto as an
"official, standard, core" part of Kerberos.
I'm quite sure you're
Adam Megacz wrote:
> I really think it's more of a political issue than anything else; I
> doubt they'd ever accept anything involving public key crypto as an
> "official, standard, core" part of Kerberos. And I can't say I
> disagree with them.
Its not a political issue. Its a resource issue.
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Granted these models are currently not distributed such that you could
> download an implementation from MIT or KTH but that is because there
> has not been appropriate demand for such functionality and the current
> Kerberos implementors do not have th
