Dan Pritts wrote:
>>> ...which are still happenning, although the timeouts are shorter.
>>> More detail to follow. sigh.
>> Depending on the symptoms the problems may have been fixed in 1.4.2.
>
> symptom is that the first time a user opened a file with a windows
> 1.5.10 client, there was a noti
> > ...which are still happenning, although the timeouts are shorter.
> > More detail to follow. sigh.
>
> Depending on the symptoms the problems may have been fixed in 1.4.2.
symptom is that the first time a user opened a file with a windows
1.5.10 client, there was a noticeable delay, on the o
Dan Pritts wrote:
>>> It may be that all of our problems have been either the long delays
>>> accessing AFS (which I think was due to the server bug that was fxed in
>>> 1.4.1),
>
> ...which are still happenning, although the timeouts are shorter.
> More detail to follow. sigh.
Depending on the
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:14:17AM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> > have in fact filed some bugs, or at least contacted you directly,
> > specifically regarding the delay issues. Also for the record you
> > were apparently responsive but somehow along the way the problem
> > didn't get solved.
Hi, Jeffrey!
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:19:03AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > I don't know where you can read about it but it is in fact true.
> > The reason it took so long to get OpenAFS for Windows to work on
> > Vista was because of the TLS support. Every Vista workstation whether
> > par
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> > And, Samba can nowadays be configured to accept kerberos
> > tickets even without being an ADS member, but Windows
> > clients will not appreciate this. But that's just Windows.
>
> This discussion is specifically related to Windo
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> And, Samba can nowadays be configured to accept kerberos
> tickets even without being an ADS member, but Windows
> clients will not appreciate this. But that's just Windows.
This discussion is specifically related to Windows client access to
AFS. Since Windows CIFS clien
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:05:20PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> In answer to your question regarding Samba. There are several sites
> that I work with who have used Samba as a gateway for users on MacOS X
> and Windows that do not have AFS clients installed. The number one
> issue that
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> Oh yes, I am aware of the greater potential for problems. I just didn't
> want to get anyone's hopes up with notions that 1.5.X will solve all
> problems. Generally though, MS Office apps seem to work better with the
> 1.5.X clients (at least in my limited scop
Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
>> I'll note that I run the 1.5.X series of clients in production,
>> although the 1.5.0901 builds seem to have serious problems when
>> mount points or symlinks are removed, but this has only really
>> affected me as most us
Dan Pritts wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:05:20PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>> Danno:
>>
>> I suspect that if people filed more bug reports when problems were
>> experienced that things would get fixed faster. I understand that folks
>
> for the record (and I know *you* know this), our wi
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:05:20PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Danno:
>
> I suspect that if people filed more bug reports when problems were
> experienced that things would get fixed faster. I understand that folks
for the record (and I know *you* know this), our windows support folks
have in
Daniel Clark wrote:
> BTW the following web pages need to be updated with links to the new
> location of the AFSLore wiki:
>
>* http://www.openafs.org/ (Navigation Frame, 3rd item down).
The navbar was updated with this change on Sept 15th of this year.
Perhaps your browser is caching an old
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
> I'll note that I run the 1.5.X series of clients in production, although
> the 1.5.0901 builds seem to have serious problems when mount points or
> symlinks are removed, but this has only really affected me as most users
> do not need to use such features, especia
On 10/16/06, Dan Pritts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks -
what's the current status of using samba to serve files from an
AFS backend to windows clients?
There is a (hopefully pretty complete) list of methods of doing this up at:
* http://www.dementia.org/twiki/bin/view/AFSLore/SMBtoAF
Danno:
I suspect that if people filed more bug reports when problems were
experienced that things would get fixed faster. I understand that folks
are reluctant to file reports when they can't reproduce the problems or
when there are no resources available to assist in debugging or
identifying the
Dan Pritts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> some of it has been mysterious issues with changes not being saved.
> I think this is really because they are simultaneously editing AFS
> files with MS office, because they refuse to drag files to their
> desktop before opening and the 1.4 client we're using
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 03:39:09PM -0400, Dan Pritts wrote:
> what's the current status of using samba to serve files from an
> AFS backend to windows clients? I could easily use Linux or Solaris
> as the samba server. Other platforms would be possible.
That works perfectly fine.
> how does ha
Hi folks -
what's the current status of using samba to serve files from an
AFS backend to windows clients? I could easily use Linux or Solaris
as the samba server. Other platforms would be possible.
how does handle file locking? How does it handle authentication?
can you successfully use MS
19 matches
Mail list logo
