Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > chapter1: > * about upgrading OS: > **Should the namei fileserver be mentioned? Is namei the > recommended way? inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei is recommended in all other cases, and generally is the only possible method. >

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-28 Thread Derrick Brashear
On Nov 28, 2007 11:03 PM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > chapter1: > > * about upgrading OS: > > **Should the namei fileserver be mentioned? Is namei the > > recommended way? > > inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-29 Thread Harald Barth
> inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei is recommended in all other > cases, and generally is the only possible method. I would recommend namei for all new installations. Is there any reason against that which I'm not aware of? Harald. ___ Ope

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-29 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Russ Allbery wrote: Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: chapter1: * about upgrading OS: **Should the namei fileserver be mentioned? Is namei the recommended way? inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei is recommended in all other cases, and generally is the only p

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-29 Thread Rob Banz
On Nov 29, 2007, at 08:39, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Russ Allbery writes: ** about fsck: does solaris use inode, namei or both? Is clarification needed? Solaris can use either, so yes, clarification is needed. I'm fairly sure you don't need th

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-29 Thread chas williams - CONTRACTOR
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Russ Allbery writes: >>** about fsck: does solaris use inode, namei or both? Is >> clarification needed? > >Solaris can use either, so yes, clarification is needed. I'm fairly sure >you don't need the custom fsck if you use namei. you do not need the custom

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Altman
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Russ Allbery writes: >>>** about fsck: does solaris use inode, namei or both? Is >>> clarification needed? >> Solaris can use either, so yes, clarification is needed. I'm fairly sure >> you don't need the custom fsck if you

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-12-01 Thread Brian Gallew
Jeffrey Altman wrote: Except that when you use memcache you lose the benefits of the cache between restarts. There are many organizations that use cache sizes large enough so that the entire 90+% of the data needed for the operating system and applications comes from the cache. After a restart

Re: [OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Quick Start Guide updated for Kerberos v5

2007-12-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Brian Gallew wrote: > Jeffrey Altman wrote: >> Except that when you use memcache you lose the benefits of the cache >> between restarts. There are many organizations that use cache sizes >> large enough so that the entire 90+% of the data needed for the >> operating system and applications comes