Re: Linux client performance - was Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-04-17 Thread Rich Sudlow
On 04/17/2015 10:02 AM, Volkmar Glauche wrote: Dear all, for the sake of completeness, I would like to revive this thread and share some of my findings. As I wrote below, I intended to make better use of large disks for AFS cache partitions, but my initial attempts actually made the AFS clients

Linux client performance - was Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-04-17 Thread Volkmar Glauche
Dear all, for the sake of completeness, I would like to revive this thread and share some of my findings. As I wrote below, I intended to make better use of large disks for AFS cache partitions, but my initial attempts actually made the AFS clients unusable for our requirements. One problem

RE: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-01-21 Thread Robert Milkowski
It currently pre-allocates some files in the cache and/or checks that they are already there, and also it currently happens serially from a single thread. Ideally afsd should be able to dynamically create files when needed and avoid pre-allocating them during start up. Best regards, Robert Milk

Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS 1.6.5 Linux client cache sizes

2015-01-08 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Volkmar Glauche writes: > Dear all, > > we are running OpenAFS clients with up to 1TB space available for > cache partitions. These are multiuser cluster nodes where cache space > should be as large as possible. Until now, there was (inadvertently) a > limit of ~200GB set to the cache size b