--On Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:24:10 PM + Simon Wilkinson
wrote:
On 16 Dec 2009, at 23:03, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
How do you propose to automate that, given that the existing
configuration could provide arbitrary arguments or even use
arbitrary binaries for the various fs bnode
On 16 Dec 2009, at 23:03, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
How do you propose to automate that, given that the existing
configuration could provide arbitrary arguments or even use
arbitrary binaries for the various fs bnode commands?
If you're using my package, you'd better be using my binaries. I
Jeffrey Hutzelman writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The package should recognize that an upgrade is happening and adjust
>> the bos configuration accordingly.
> How do you propose to automate that, given that the existing
> configuration could provide arbitrary arguments or even use arbitrary
>
--On Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:40:18 PM -0800 Russ Allbery
wrote:
"Buhrmaster, Gary" writes:
Many (linux) packaging systems will just replace older versions without
a discussion with the installer about what else they need to change (it
is actually a pet peeve of mine that there is no
"Buhrmaster, Gary" writes:
> Many (linux) packaging systems will just replace older versions without
> a discussion with the installer about what else they need to change (it
> is actually a pet peeve of mine that there is nothing equivalent to the
> SMP/E "HOLD(DOC)" capability(*) in most packag
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:41:47 -0800
> "Buhrmaster, Gary" wrote:
>
>> > Right, but if it is part of the initial 1.6 release, I think people
>> > will quite a bit more cautious then just replacing binaries anyway
>> > since it is a major versio
> Right, but if it is part of the initial 1.6 release, I think people
> will quite a bit more cautious then just replacing binaries anyway
> since it is a major version change then then a .x update.
Not all the people running openAFS will be as knowledgably
(even as to the numbering system of a 1.
Quoting "Steven Jenkins" :
First, I think this is a *really* good idea.
However, the bos configuration for the fileserver changes from
non-DAFS to DAFS, so we need to make sure that people know that as
part of the upgrade. If you just replace the binaries and restart,
you won't be happy.
Ri
