On Saturday, December 03, 2005 10:53:23 PM -0500 Jeffrey Altman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tfitz wrote:
Does the server lock implementation really depend on
client-side benevolence?
Yes it does.
But then, like UNIX file locks, locks on AFS are advisory, not mandatory.
That means that h
tfitz wrote:
Does the server lock implementation really depend on
client-side benevolence?
Yes it does.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
David Bear wrote:
since file locking is 'just around the corner' for openafs (at least
I'm hopeful) the question I have now is will (is) there be a way to
ask the server who has a particular file open.
The information is somewhat available (eventually) by turning
up debugging on the fileserver
David Bear wrote:
since file locking is 'just around the corner' for openafs (at least
I'm hopeful) the question I have now is will (is) there be a way to
ask the server who has a particular file open. the afs server has to
keep track of which client has a file open in order to force the cache
ma
"file locking" is not just around the corner... It has always been
there, and has always worked fine... If you're meaning "byte range
partial file locking", then yes, that is in the current release
candidate for windows only, and is purely client side.
At best, you could determine who has callbac
