On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
This patch looks good but there are some poll apis used which are
available via coroapi.
Hi
Yes, I have seperated out my initial patch and my subsequent work into
the integration patch. In this patch I am using a pthread to poll
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/24/2010 05:55 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
pacemaker is waiting for something in nanosleep. Not sure what.
Should I ping the pacemaker list separately? I'm not sure how much
overlap there is between here and
The solution is to grab 1.1.3 from www.clusterlabs.org/rpm-next and
use pacemaker's new mcp.
Option 2 as described at:
http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for
Wow...after a day of testing, what a world of difference.
On 09/26/2010 10:59 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
The solution is to grab 1.1.3 from www.clusterlabs.org/rpm-next and
use pacemaker's new mcp.
Option 2 as described at:
http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for
Wow...after
Hi Steve,
Please comment on the same.
Regards,
Ranjith
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Ranjith ranjith.nath...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Just to make it clear. Do you mean that in the above case If N3 is part of
the network, it should have connectivity to both N2 and N1 and if it happens
