Alain,
Moullé Alain napsal(a):
> Hi
> Thanks Steven and Jan.
>
> OK, so "passive" mode seems to be more safer for now ...
>
> So questions about passive mode, just to clarify completely the behavior
> (I think it could be useful for all users) :
>
> 1/ in the case both networks are up and worki
Hi
Thanks Steven and Jan.
OK, so "passive" mode seems to be more safer for now ...
So questions about passive mode, just to clarify completely the behavior
(I think it could be useful for all users) :
1/ in the case both networks are up and working, is by default the ring
0 used at first, an
On 11/27/2013 08:20 AM, Moullé Alain wrote:
Hi,
the man page of corosync.conf gives :
"Active replication offers slightly lower latency from transmit to
delivery in faulty network environments but with less performance.
Passive replication may nearly double the speed of the totem protocol
if
Alain,
passive mode is much better tested. Another big plus of passive is, that
if one network becomes faulty, passive makes progress (one packet is
send thru active device, another via faulty - this is not delivered but
resend via active device, ...). Active RRP waits until enough failures
and the
Hi,
the man page of corosync.conf gives :
"Active replication offers slightly lower latency from transmit to
delivery in faulty network environments but with less performance.
Passive replication may nearly double the speed of the totem protocol if
the protocol doesn’t become cpu bound"
OK b
