Hello all,
As far as I can tell, there's no particular reason that the data files
be licensed under the GPL.
I'd like to see them (a) under data licenses, and (b) preferably CC0
so that others can use them without restriction. Clearly, this cannot
be done without the agreement of the original
Hi Chris,
Just FYI, I've been playing around with the SVG output to see whether
I could improve draggability for the 1000 molecule SVG discussed at
[1]. I didn't edit the OB code; I just wrote a Python script to
transform the SVG (see [2]).
(A) There was a suggestion in the comments at [1] that:
Noel
Your mobility loss is certainly benefiting OpenBabel a lot :-)
On 03/03/2012 15:56, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
Just FYI, I've been playing around with the SVG output to see whether
I could improve draggability for the 1000 molecule SVG discussed at
[1]. I didn't edit the OB code; I just wrote
Hi Noel,
Did I miss a previous discussion? Which data files are we talking about?
Craig
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Noel O'Boyle baoille...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
As far as I can tell, there's no particular reason that the data files
be licensed under the GPL.
I'd like to see
I guess it's not so important, but maybe going forward we can attach a
CC0 license to files if they are reusable by others.
Some of the files come via the Blue Obelisk Data Repository, so these aren't
covered by GPL even if the header says that.
Some of the other files would be a bit tricky
