On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Geoff Hutchison
wrote:
> > I originally had happyHTTP in the resolver format as you suggested,
> > giving good modularity.
>
> This is definitely what's going to happen for 2.3.2, along with some
> testing. I'm a bit hesitant on code which is clearly unmaintained.
> I originally had happyHTTP in the resolver format as you suggested,
> giving good modularity.
This is definitely what's going to happen for 2.3.2, along with some testing.
I'm a bit hesitant on code which is clearly unmaintained. But for one format,
it's probably OK.
> But it seems a shame n
Noel
I originally had happyHTTP in the resolver format as you suggested,
giving good modularity.
But it seems a shame not to be able to access files directly from the
web for any input format, as in the last example I gave or
obabel http://gaseq.co.uk/OB/first.sdf -osmi
The http call nee
