Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
Atom typing for force fields is not done through the internal type translation. For fidelity, it is done by the force field code itself. I haven't had time to look at code changes, but I suspect there have been GAFF patches since 2.3.2. Geoff On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, David van der Spoel

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread David van der Spoel
On 22 okt 2014, at 15:21, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: >> I am using the developer version in my programs, I have to use that, please >> help me understand why the developer version of openbabel has problem to >> match cc and cd atom types. > > The difference is that I noticed v2.3.2 was still

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> I am using the developer version in my programs, I have to use that, please > help me understand why the developer version of openbabel has problem to > match cc and cd atom types. The difference is that I noticed v2.3.2 was still using the Ghemical force field as the default, which isn't a

[OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread Mohammad Mehdi Ghahremanpour
Hi All, I used obenergy command from two different version of openbabel on the same molecule, but I got two different output. The atom type is different. The molecule is 4-methyloxazole. I once used the developer version and once openbabel-2.3.2. Please have a look at the results presented bel