> Hrm, is 2.3.1 going to be released from the openbabel-2-3-x subversion
> branch? There has not been a lot of activity there (no commit in 4
> months, AFAICT), so maybe I am looking at the wrong tree?
Unfortunately, my attention has been elsewhere. But you'll see plenty of
commits soon. I've be
On 15 September 2011 11:48, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
>> OK, I think it's more than overdue to release 2.3.1. We have a *lot*
>> of improvements in this release and it's time to get it out the door
>> and start in on other th
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
> OK, I think it's more than overdue to release 2.3.1. We have a *lot*
> of improvements in this release and it's time to get it out the door
> and start in on other things
Hrm, is 2.3.1 going to be released from the openbab
On 14 September 2011 13:52, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
>> On second thoughts, I think I'll wait until after the release to sort
>> this out.
>
> So I should revert (or not apply) the parsmarts patch for 2.3.1, correct?
Exactly. I think you've already reverted it on the trunk, so you could
just mer
> On second thoughts, I think I'll wait until after the release to sort
> this out.
So I should revert (or not apply) the parsmarts patch for 2.3.1, correct?
> I'd prefer to see the current code go out the door.
Great, I'll start to merge patches into the 2-3-x branch and we can give some
time
On 13 September 2011 19:51, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
>> The patch is correct. It just exposes some bugs in the SMARTS matcher
>> for stereochemistry. I'm 50% through resolving it. Can you hang on
>> another few days and I'll have it sorted?
>
> OK, sounds good.
>
> -Geoff
On second thoughts, I t
> The patch is correct. It just exposes some bugs in the SMARTS matcher
> for stereochemistry. I'm 50% through resolving it. Can you hang on
> another few days and I'll have it sorted?
OK, sounds good.
-Geoff
--
BlackBer
The patch is correct. It just exposes some bugs in the SMARTS matcher
for stereochemistry. I'm 50% through resolving it. Can you hang on
another few days and I'll have it sorted?
- Noel
On 13 September 2011 18:50, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
> OK, I think it's more than overdue to release 2.3.1. W
OK, I think it's more than overdue to release 2.3.1. We have a *lot* of
improvements in this release and it's time to get it out the door and start in
on other things (e.g., there can always be a 2.3.2 when needed).
I accidentally introduce a test failure with my recent UFF hacking, which is
no
