Alamood, Bahaaldin wrote:
still enforcing the rest. If you guys think that this is a good Idea
then I could submit it to the CVS.
please also update the CHANGES file and submit to cvs too ;)
greetings
dalini
---
SF email is sponsored by - The I
Alamood, Bahaaldin wrote:
I think it is a good idea. I would like to see it be in the 0.9.2
branch.
I have a local modification to this function where it will enforce the
attribute type but not the value. For example I want my users to have a
dn with this kind of structure DN: CN=someName, OU=someO
Martin Bartosch wrote:
Question: should I submit this extension to the 0.9.2 branch or should
I keep this change as a local modification for our project only?
Commit it.
Michael
--
___
Michael BellHumboldt-Universitaet
Martin,
I think it is a good idea. I would like to see it be in the 0.9.2
branch.
I have a local modification to this function where it will enforce the
attribute type but not the value. For example I want my users to have a
dn with this kind of structure DN: CN=someName, OU=someOU, L=" Any
locali
Hi,
the function checkPkcs10_req in pkcs10_req performs some checks on the
DN of an incoming PKCS#10 request.
I would like to add an additional check that compares the keysize of
an incoming request against a configurable minimum keylength (in order
to prevent 512 Bit requests).
This would requi
