Re: [OpenCA-Devel] openca-0.9.2-RC4-bindir.diff

2004-04-19 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 19 april 2004 09.21 skrev Michael Bell: Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I just downloaded openca-0.9.2-RC4 and found my bindir patch a little off. Here's a new one (attached). Wouldn't it be more consistent to do it like this? Did you test your patch with and without

Re: [OpenCA-Devel] openca-0.9.2-RC4-bindir.diff

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Bell
måndagen den 19 april 2004 09.21 skrev Michael Bell: Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I just downloaded openca-0.9.2-RC4 and found my bindir patch a little off. Here's a new one (attached). Wouldn't it be more consistent to do it like this? Did you test your patch with and without

Re: [OpenCA-Devel] openca-0.9.2-RC4-bindir.diff

2004-04-19 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 19 april 2004 16.52 skrev Michael Bell: måndagen den 19 april 2004 09.21 skrev Michael Bell: Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I just downloaded openca-0.9.2-RC4 and found my bindir patch a little off. Here's a new one (attached). Wouldn't it be more consistent to do it like

Re: [OpenCA-Devel] openca-0.9.2-RC4-bindir.diff

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Bell
Hi, I did not try this to build a default OpenCA. Why are there a workaround in the first place? The workaround is present because we have components which must be installed in exec_prefix. Autoconf doesn't resolve ${exec_prefix} if it is not explicitly set by --exec-prefix. Therefore we