On 03/23/2017 11:54 PM, Vishnu Priya wrote:
Thanks Nil. But i have few questions.
1. In real time reasoning, each and every time will you look at the
input data and decide the rules manually?
No. Inference control (IC) would decide what rule(s) to apply. ATM IC is
rather stupid and
ah I see, thank you for explaining :)
On Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 10:03:53 PM UTC-4, linas wrote:
>
> expert systems are unable to apply the knowledge they contain. So for
> example, an expert system in geological formations is not actually able to
> drill oil wells ... it simply can
Hi sorry to reply to older thread, but could one make an expert system
whose domain *is* learning itself (supervised or unsupervised)? In theory,
I mean.
Like, such an expert system could be filled with knowledge about learning
and epistemology, and its inference engine would be taught rules
Thanks Nil. But i have few questions.
1. In real time reasoning, each and every time will you look at the
input data and decide the rules manually?
2. Only when the input is in certain form of the rule (or matches with
the rule) which is being chosen, we obtain inferences?
Those epithets I devoted to https://www.general-ai-challenge.org
I think that there is pressing need to test in practice all the ideas and
systems that have been developed so far. Every competition is welcome.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 9:59:03 PM UTC+1, Alex wrote:
>
> I have heard about this challenge, but it distributes funds and is
> intended for novel short programs
>
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "it distributes funds" and "is
intended for novel short programs"
> and, as I
