Its nice to know that spam checks are much faster now. But, what about
the accuracy? Do you get the same level of accuracy or find anything odd?
The accuracy seems very good, but it's a small server and I haven't
really ran it long enough to know for sure. I'll report back if I notice
anyth
Sorry to break in here, but after updating to 5.0.1.9 I noticed the
percentage of spam caught went from around 89% to 99% immediately.
Working great so far the second day in. Server is RH Enterprise 3.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Dear Rob,
This is really great, because my mail server was a bit strained before
and is running much smoother now. The mail server is a 400MHz Celeron
and it was using half it's allocated swap memory before, but it's not
using hardly any swap memory now.
Its nice to know that spam checks are mu
Its because bigevil which used to take around 65 MB has been removed and
its functionality has been replaced with SURBL which uses less CPU also
and instead uses a network lookup to identify spam.
This is really great, because my mail server was a bit strained before
and is running much smoo
