I would agree, 80k is way too much for resent e-mails and our Mdaemon server
simply can't handle it as Linux is able to delivery much more efficiently.
However, that being said, I believe that the default install of Open Protect
uses Sendmail. Our Open protect server is a default install of RH8 an
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Opencomputing-openprotect] E-mail hammering
> Which MTA - I'm seeing this occasionally with qmail - I don't think the
> openprotect filename algorithm is correct - it does not follow the DJB
> wa
Dear Clive,
Scott Heisler wrote:
We use an open protect e-mail server as the gate for our e-mail.
Inside, we
use product called Mdaemon. It's been in place for many years and
provides
good internal as well as external e-mail for us. Anyway, the reason I'm
writing this is because the openprotec
Which MTA - I'm seeing this occasionally with qmail - I don't think the
openprotect filename algorithm is correct - it does not follow the DJB
way - but I can't prove it yet :-)
Hmm, there is nothing wrong in the file name algo of qmail.pm of
MailScanner, the reason DJBs way cant be followed is
Scott Heisler wrote:
We use an open protect e-mail server as the gate for our e-mail. Inside, we
use product called Mdaemon. It's been in place for many years and provides
good internal as well as external e-mail for us. Anyway, the reason I'm
writing this is because the openprotect server keeps
We use an open protect e-mail server as the gate for our e-mail. Inside, we
use product called Mdaemon. It's been in place for many years and provides
good internal as well as external e-mail for us. Anyway, the reason I'm
writing this is because the openprotect server keeps re-sending the same
