On 29-06-18 10:26, Thomas Beale wrote:
I think you have a good point about the documented uses of archetypes
potentially being too narrow - it would be worth a global review to
see if anything already there can be used for purposes different from
that originally envisaged. I wonder if clinical
On 29-06-18 15:01, Thomas Beale wrote:
Others may have better ideas, interested to hear from anyone who works
with this kind of data.
I sport a lot, every day, but only very amateur, never did a serious
match, but I climbed several mountains on a bike, also the tough ones
like the Tourmalet
On 29-06-18 07:38, Heather Leslie wrote:
BTW Bert - here's a project that has some archetypes that might be useful for
your diet app scenario:https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/#showProject_1013.30.47.
They were volunteered by some of our Portuguese colleagues and refined by CKM
Editors.
Thanks, I
On 29-06-18 07:13, Heather Leslie wrote:
please try not to disseminate this kind of message.
I understand the message, Heather, and every time when I express some
criticism about how CKM is functioning, I never forget to tell how
important it is and how good work it is. When you would had cop
On 29-06-18 01:11, GF wrote:
Any one automobile or airplane or house is built using many, many
standards.
You are right Gerard, that was I was in my joke explicitly talking about
interoperability standards.
Bert
___
openEHR-clinical mailing list
In fact, I think Athanasios was advocating this approach in the other
thread.
I think that what you are describing is something like "An automated approach to
constructing disease specific 'Minimal Clinical Datasets'".
Once you have this minimal dataset discovered, THEN you could compose the
To the extent that I have thought about this area (not deeply), I
suspect that clinical models for these types of use probably should take
the form of templates that 'mix in' multiple bits and pieces from
existing clinical archetypes.
A complex of data elements that you might expect from a
Exactly right. Archetypes are high-value clinical informatics work, and
they are free. Making more of them, faster, means getting more clinician
and informatician time, which means that projects who would like to have
domain models of information and process - even if their final
consumption
Dear Evelyn!
Thanks for the support! Please note that the statement is not mine, but
from Edward Shortliffe. He was together with Christoph Lehmann, Patrice
Degoulet and Hyeoun-Ae Park and Elaine Huesing leading the election
process of the IMIA academy. The world is small :)
Thanks also for t
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 08:34:20AM +0200, GF wrote:
> The GDPR allows the collection of health data.
> The GDPR restricts itself to person identifiable data and it secondary
> use/abuse of privacy rights.
>
> Since health and care are about all of society, all of life, all must be able
> to be
On 28/06/2018 15:49, Bert Verhees wrote:
That could be possible, but then you get structure, and
node-identifiers. Maybe just flat paths are more convenient, so that
the OBSERVATION archetypes do not require CLUSTERS but ITEMs so that
it is possible to include ELEMENTs on that point. I don't
Dear Evelyn,
The ideas I have are collected in a rough document called SIAMM (Semantic
Interpretability Artefact Modelling Method)
This is known by several persons active in ISO/CEN.
At present I’m no longer actively involved in standardisation work.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.
Thanks Heather for your reply. Unfortunately I am whole day not able to
reply. This evening or tomorrow.
Best regards
Bert
Op vr 29 jun. 2018 07:39 schreef Heather Leslie <
heather.les...@atomicainformatics.com>:
> I totally endorse what Thomas is saying here.
>
> Let's be realistic here! CKM is
13 matches
Mail list logo
