Perhaps the best solution for the time being is to add an additional diagnosis
component with the secondary terminology binding that might be used. This is
not so common and would need a BR specialization.
Beatriz
> On Mar 15, 2017, at 6:31 PM, Bert Verhees wrote:
>
> We are considering th
Very good discussion.
Regarding Brazil - I cannot speak on behalf of the MOH but what we’ve been
informed is that the MInister demanded the Financial Area to pay SNOMED-CT. We
all hope this is going to happen soon.
Meanwhile some organizations (private hospitals) have a SNOMED license. THe
Hos
Wonderful discussion.
I go with Eric - “Is deceased” or “Has died” ? [ Using both supports future
recording of post-cryogenic or other types of resurrections ;-) ]
Here in Brazil at our national database with 220 M we use the HL7 demographic
approach. I agree this ADT death is different from
Thanks Tony. Very useful.
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Tony Shannon wrote:
> For your interest...
>
> ##
> You may be interested in this article just out from the NEJM.
> "Can Electronic Clinical Documentation Help Prevent Diagnostic Errors?"
> http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/362/12/1066?
4 matches
Mail list logo