Re: Problem orientation in OpenEHR

tc; c) querying for clinical Obs, Dxs etc remains independent of SOAP >> notes and d) SOAP notes don't get lost in the miasma of past event data, >> they are instead headline parts of the EHR. >> >> In this way, SOAP notes, inasfar as they are used in any given EHR, >> beco

Re: Problem orientation in OpenEHR

I'm not ready to give up on POMR just yet. It is a lot of work and difficult to maintain, as Ian points out, but as a locum GP, when I work in practices that use problem orientation it is MUCH easier and safer to treat people you don't know. Practices that just dump everything into the record

Re: Downloading previous versions of archetypes from CKM

Interesting discussion and I agree with Ian that the openEHR community should remember to give itself credit for what HAS been done, with very little resource, rather than beating themselves up about what tooling is missing from the ecosystem. An automated archetype package and dependency

Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %

As a relative OpenEHR outsider but a data modelling enthusiast, I would agree with Silje that if this is known to be a proportion then using DV_PROPORTION seems more intuitive, as this preserves the semantics of the data. It also would allow confident conversion of that data into other types of

Re: ECG archetype advice required

+1 I would echo Ivar's comments - keep it simple and use 1/min. It is clear we are talking about the rate of cardiac electrical activity from the context. The use of the word 'beats' would also undoubtedly (rightly) come under fire from cardiological/intensivist pedants like me - as a 'beat' is

Re: Better approach for announcements, forums?

Hi Roger, answers to your query are below: On 5 January 2017 at 14:18, Roger Erens <roger.er...@e-s-c.biz> wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > thanks for the summarizing the highlights of Discourse. > One request for elaboration, please: > > 2017-01-05 14:31 GMT+01:00 Marcus

Re: Better approach for announcements, forums?

/ libraries / tools announcements (= web home page news items > >> with cog icon, also here) > >> > >> this includes open source software libs / projects > >> > >> commercial product offerings - currently we don't really have a way of > >> doing this, but

Re: Seeking expertise on addiction medicine...

Hi Heather, I have a couple of years' experience dealing with and prescribing for substance misuse in a British prison environment. The main drugs in question were opioids, cocaine, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, alcohol, and commonly abused prescription drugs such as pregabalin and gabapentin.

Re: Nation wide EHR project by openEHR/ISO13606 got fund in Japan.

Congratulations Shinji! Will this mean more funding for the Ruby/Rails openEHR work? M On 8 October 2015 at 13:36, Diego Boscá wrote: > Congratulations to you and all the team. I'm really happy for all of you. > > Regards > El 8/10/2015 14:25, "Nadim Anani"

Re: openEHR @ StackExchange

Good luck Thomas, I hope this works and I have added my support, although there was a move recently to create an umbrella Health IT StackExchange and it didn't attract enough support (despite being widely advertised) to trigger its promotion out of Area51 and into StackExchange. If your openEHR

openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 38

, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Director, openEHR Foundation Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 14 March 2015 at 22:01, Marcus Baw marcusbaw at gmail.com wrote: Non profits with a free CKM licence would be public not private. This is the github model On 14 Mar

How to fix CKM biggest issue

On 14 March 2015 at 04:53, pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote: For me the biggest concern, besides the limited publishing capabilities or non editors, is that the CKM is made over proprietary software, that doesn't allow us to create our own instances of the CKM for free, and share

How to fix CKM biggest issue

, CHIME, UCL On 14 March 2015 at 13:20, Marcus Baw marcusbaw at gmail.com wrote: On 14 March 2015 at 04:53, pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote: For me the biggest concern, besides the limited publishing capabilities or non editors, is that the CKM is made over proprietary software

openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 38

at openehr-clinical-owner at lists.openehr.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of openEHR-clinical digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: How to fix CKM biggest issue (Marcus Baw) 2. RE: How to fix CKM biggest issue (pablo

How to fix CKM biggest issue

At the risk of upsetting people, I am going to stick my neck out here in support of Gustavo. It has long puzzled me why a technology like openEHR - which is intended to foster sharing of Archetypes for the universal use case and trying to conquer the massive problem of international