Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-03 Thread Bert Verhees
On 03-07-18 13:13, Anastasiou A. wrote: Initially, I thought that it would have been this one Opinions from yesterday may still be valid today. Inventions and business models follow up quickly. But the law is behind, as law should be: conservative, keeping an eye on human rights. _

Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-03 Thread Bert Verhees
On 03-07-18 12:21, Philippe Ameline wrote: Le 02/07/2018 à 11:31, Bert Verhees a écrit : On 30-06-18 17:16, Philippe Ameline wrote: (improperly labeling images or adding images of objects that are not plants) could probably make the whole app plainly crappy. Of course Philippe, but that would

RE: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-03 Thread Anastasiou A .
%22%20epidemiology&f=false All the best Athanasios Anastasiou From: openEHR-clinical On Behalf Of Philippe Ameline Sent: 03 July 2018 12:02 To: Birger Haarbrandt ; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts) BTW,

Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-03 Thread Philippe Ameline
BTW, is someone aware of this project by Google? https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/deep-learning-for-electronic-health.html Le 03/07/2018 à 12:40, Birger Haarbrandt a écrit : > Hi Philippe, > > I completely agree with your view. This is why data stewardship is > needed before we can make real use

Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-03 Thread Birger Haarbrandt
Hi Philippe, I completely agree with your view. This is why data stewardship is needed before we can make real use of the data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_steward As we use this approach in HiGHmed, I might be able to report in 2020 about lessons learned :) Best, -- *Birger Haarbr

Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-03 Thread Philippe Ameline
Le 02/07/2018 à 11:31, Bert Verhees a écrit : > On 30-06-18 17:16, Philippe Ameline wrote: >> (improperly labeling images or adding images of objects that are not >> plants) could probably make the whole app plainly crappy. > > Of course Philippe, but that would be vandalism. Most sensible people

Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-07-02 Thread Bert Verhees
On 30-06-18 17:16, Philippe Ameline wrote: (improperly labeling images or adding images of objects that are not plants) could probably make the whole app plainly crappy. Of course Philippe, but that would be vandalism. Most sensible people don't do that when they stand behind the goal, and a l

Re: Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-06-30 Thread GF
Data of perfect quality means, in my opinion, data and their complete context. A diagnosis by a nurse is not the same as one by a patiente, or strting intern, or one MD with 20m years experience. Just mentioning one example. Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801

Science of Machine Learning (was Machine Learning , some thoughts)

2018-06-30 Thread Philippe Ameline
Le 27/06/2018 à 22:26, Bert Verhees a écrit : > On 27-06-18 16:43, Philippe Ameline wrote: >> 1) you can find a bunch of practitioners that agree on working extra >> hours to comment a big bunch of images, or > > Did I tell you about the plant-app? I believe I did. 700.000 pictures > are reviewed,