Tim
I think this is true but from a date point of view we can only know the year
if the month is unknown - if it is one or two then the person will have to
guess and store it as a fuzzy date. I think this is the only sensible
approach. We can record in text the time issues that have been
This was meant to be a data type for the physical location of something - an
Xray film, specimen etc. I agree that this should be an archetype.
Cheers, Sam
-Original Message-
From: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
[mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org]On Behalf Of
so in other words: represent and store as a % but allow input and
display as DV_QUANTITY or %? Hm... this might need an
extra flag if the DV_QUANTIFIED object is to remember whether it
was
originally in % or quantity form.
Extra flag (attribute) good point.
DV_QUANTIFIED.is_quantity
record and think that the two dates were probably the
same, and that it
was therefore the same fracture. I would guess that this
is a real
contrived long shot, and probably unrealistic, but we
need some more
evidence from clinicians...
*** CAUTION *** This turned into a rambling about
4 matches
Mail list logo