Christopher Feahr wrote:
Dear Group,
I have just recently joined your listserve, and have been actively
participating in the HL7 EHR ballot discussion for only a few weeks.
During the four years prior to that, I had been swimming in the
HIPAA-EDI ocean, trying to figure out how the operational
I should have also mentioned another reason why local EMRs have to be
left intact, at least for the time being - it is te psychological one
that their owners will not feel as if they are having their system taken
away from them.
- t
-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please
Thomas Clark wrote:
What was your study to do with?
this is the meat of the problem...
STUDY:
-several counties in California and Nevada ranging from agriculture to
forestry
and their current healthcare systems
-current budgetary constraints and potential for new funding
-can they develop
This is a post we didn't resolve, and I would like to re-address the
question. Unfortunately, I cannot resolve either of your links Jim...can
you provide new URLs?
- thomas
Jim Warren wrote:
Dear Tom et al:
This is my de-lurking for the list. For those of you who dont' know me, I'm
a
they deserve...
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20030804/b4993d20/attachment.html
Hi,
Is it?
Is it about how to represent the domain normal values?
Or is it more general: Are concepts related?
Then the problem is: what relations are there between concepts (archetypes)?
What semantics of these relationships between archetypes (concepts) do we
need to describe reallity
Thomas,
Thank you for your comments.
At the moment, the healthcare industry relies on a federated,
duplicative system of paper and electronic records. The fragmentation
of provider-resources and of healthcare tasks themselves, combined with
the long life spans and great mobility of patients are
-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20030804/ace44cfa/attachment.html
Philippe,
Thank you for the comments. I believe that we will have islands of
health information for a very long time... for many reasons, some of
which are not technically sound, but more the result of convention. On
the other hand, the islands do facilitate an inherent security and
Thomas,
Thanks! And I hardly know where to begin responding... but I do like
all of your comments. The thing about providers being considered a
homogeneous group of individuals working for the common good is really
a matter of philosophical and, perhaps, spiritual orientation. I agree
that we
Tim,
RE: That might be an accurate description of the US healthcare system,
but thankfully the US system is restricted (more or less) to the US,
despite attempts to export it and despite attempts by misguided
politicians elsewhere to copy it(snip)... Thus, although dreams of
regional or
Tim,
I can imagine several workable funding models for healthcare. The one
we have in the US is simply the straightforward selling services for
$, perverted by the brokerage model that insurance has superimposed on
it. In my personal opinion, neither model makes sense for a service
like
Tim,
Data mining and ad hoc queries does not sound out of scope to me.
Sounds like a primary use for the EHR-data.
Christopher J. Feahr, O.D.
Optiserv Consulting (Vision Industry)
Office: (707) 579-4984
Cell: (707) 529-2268
http://Optiserv.com
http://VisionDataStandard.org
- Original Message
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the response! The regional approach serves the project well
initially.
The original post should have included some idea of what I think a 'tool'
would be.
Top-down, it should permit a proper user to identify the subject (difficult
in some
cases, e.g., where only an infant
14 matches
Mail list logo
