An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051021/43bd828c/attachment.html
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051021/9a530b40/attachment.html
I think this conversation needs to be off-line as it is more
philosophical and feels like lets start all over again. We do need
to be able to justify the openEHR approach but not on this technical
list. I am very interested in an informed critique of the openEHR
approach if you read our
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051021/a2b7da1d/attachment.html
: jamaldo at upvnet.upv.es
http://bet.upv.es
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20051021/35369352/attachment.html
Hi Alberto,
Jose Alberto Maldonado wrote:
Hi,
Just a doubt.
Why the classes names are not included in the XML-Schema?. For
instance, it would convenient for multi-valued attributes in order to
distinguish one data instance from another (imagine the potential mess
if the attribute is
6 matches
Mail list logo