Hmm, interesting idea.
H
-Original Message-
From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-
bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Peter Gummer
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2009 5:50 PM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: Archetyping links
Rong
yes, I meant properties of their targets as grounds
for constraining them
Grahame
-Original Message-
From: openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Heath Frankel
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:00 AM
To: 'For openEHR technical
Hi Heath,
I complety agree with you. Let's all do what we're best at. What I
would like to add to your proposal is some feedback (both ways) so
doctors and technicians can learn from eachother. Rather than de-
empowering the one or the other I think we should team up to create a
properly
Hi Heath and Peter
Peter Gummer wrote:
Heath Frankel wrote:
I strongly believe that we need to have a
technical review process of archetypes before they are published. ...
Please understand that I not trying to re-empower the technician, I am
simply looking for good quality knowledge
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090623/bf0d5aee/attachment.html
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090623/230a3c8c
:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090623/2cc83b23/attachment.html
of this?
Or something from DCM or CDA or others on which we could base such a model
to be compatible with?
Regards
Sebastian
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090623
8 matches
Mail list logo
